Self-insert syndrome: Difference between revisions
Gem Control (talk | contribs) (Why change the image?) Tag: Undo |
Gem Control (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== [[Chud]] Variant == | == [[Chud]] Variant == | ||
[[File:Self insert map europe.png|thumb|none|A map of europe showing which kind of self-inserting is more popular in]] | [[File:Self insert map europe.png|thumb|none|A map of europe showing which kind of self-inserting is more popular in different countries]] | ||
Sometimes the poster attempts to rectify their identification with these drawings, usually depicting effeminate nu-males or similarly pathetic individuals, by making them muscular or well-hung, so, just don’t be fooled. | Sometimes the poster attempts to rectify their identification with these drawings, usually depicting effeminate nu-males or similarly pathetic individuals, by making them muscular or well-hung, so, just don’t be fooled. | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 5 January 2024
Self-insert syndrome is CONGOLESE VANTABLACK BRIMSTONE straight from the FIERY DEPTHS OF NIGGERHELL!!!!!!!!!!!
Neutralplier posters are trans btw, if that matters. |
Self-insert syndrome | |
---|---|
Symptoms |
|
Comorbidities |
|
Treatment |
|
Frequency | At least one neutralplier post on the catty at any time. Very frequent in 2023. |
Prognosis | Possibly -ACKing within several weeks |
Self-inserting is a mental-illness similar to autogynephilia, in which it is characterized by a 'jakker that starts to identify as the "soy boy" drawings he collects so dearly, to the point of using them as avatars.
Like other paraphilias, self-insert syndrome is a sign of greater suffering or trauma deep within the individual, but isn't by itself harmful unless the weird behavior has social consequences, nonetheless, it should be pathologized and stamped out for the nebulous standard of normality of the atomized individual in the neo-liberal system of free exchange.[1]
Self-insert syndrome doesn't feature in the DSM-V, which according to Dr. Soyswedeson and colleagues, "confines the syndrome's rate of incidence to tragic obscurity" and that "Further inquiry into the psykosexual aspekten [sic] of this condition could be fruitful", closing off, on an eerie note, "we're working on making it notable enough for the DSM."
Chud Variant
Sometimes the poster attempts to rectify their identification with these drawings, usually depicting effeminate nu-males or similarly pathetic individuals, by making them muscular or well-hung, so, just don’t be fooled.
So far, it appears to be an off-shoot to self-insert syndrome, seeing as we have no peer-reviewed studies confirming that those posters really do look like and say that. It appears to be far more common thoughbeit, at the very least, and has proved controversial in the Soy Community due to some ‘teen’s disdain of ‘jaks being used as a way to portray a group in a positive light, instead of negatively as soyjaks were originally intended to just do
Controversy
Some chuds have claimed that soot was the first one to self-insert when advertising the 'sharty in /qa/ by posting a feraljak with the words "basedjaks must be in every thread".
See also
Bibliography
- Soyswedeson H. (2020). "Short letter on a Case Report Associated with Internet Addiction Disorder - A Blanchardian Analysis" Journal of Norwegian Psychiatrics