Talk:Chudjak
CHUD STANDS FOR CANNIBALISTIC HUMANOID UNDERGROUND DWELLER, YOU STUPID NIGGERS.
the chud version
>The marxist cousin of soyjak
this is bias but a joke
>wojak edit based on a registered democrat
this isnt bias. snopes didnt even "debunk" this, they only said that there is no clear answer, which basically confirms that the american shooter was a registered democrat. not only that, the politics are irrelevant. this wiki is for documenting soi posting, not american crime. do you want the science and great reset articles to be changed too?
>The word chud originates from the name of an ethnic group of Balto-Finns. The reasons for why this was used as an insult are currently unknown.
this is bias, but there is no actual evidence of the words origin.
>gay raid.
this is an insult but not bias
the tranny version
>sometimes also called Poljak
it was renamed poljak after your chud insult failed. no one calls it chudjak now apart from soi posters
>the now-defunct website Bunkerchan.
bunkerchan.net is still a website. youre lying
>It is often posted in response to an anon exhibiting a severe lack of sexhaving and going outside, behaviors that are normally associated with leftist trannies.
it is only ever posted when someones opinion disagrees with your own, unlike soijak which is very opinion based but still is used to make fun of soi boi opinions specifically. on /tv/, /int/ and /v/ there are constant threads made for the purpose of making fun of soi boi opinions. no one ever does this with chudjak, its only for trolling and is only posted in threads.
>totally real Discord conversations
this is bias. they had a link to them on the sites, and you mean to say that the /tv/ and /pol/ raid just happened like that? youre lying
>whoever posted the Chudjak is a raiding leftist tranny shill
there are literal threads on bunkerchan confirming an astroturf raid. whenever the posters of this type they have very clearly different typing styles to normal 4chan users, they react differently and are very clearly not used to this site. the only possible explanation is that they arent normal users.
the tranny version is actually more biased than the original. lol
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
SOOT LOCK THE PAGE
based keep that snopes link on here thats hilarious
so /pol/ has been spamming the registered democrat shit even though chud had no known political affiliation? lol
its not really /pol/ doing this, unless youre one of those trannies on /qa/ who think every racist on 4chan is a /pol/ cross boarder. anyway there have been multiple peer-reviewed studies which suggest that it was democrat.
The older version was better.
of this article without the snopes link? what does it even say in that?
oh i just looked at it, yeah the original version was better. i might change it back. this version has a sort of passive aggressive tone which really doesnt work well.
lol trannies are raging at this article. whats the best way to get soot to make it a protected page, or ban editing of it entirely?
keep the snope links off, it only is for benefit of the trannies. or at least argue against it here. they keep vandalising the page so soot must be made to protect it.
yikes, just yikes
It seems like this flame war is never gonna end, should we divide this page or ???
no, it shall stay how it was originally written. shall change it back. considering soot banned kara boga from his site its a rather odd move of him to allow these trannies to fuck around with his wiki. not sure what the fuck hes doing tbh, possibly trying to appease them? this wiki is clearly a joke, so anyone who would change it like that is clearly raging at the article, not because they actually care about the quality of this website. soot needs to lock the page to what it was previously.
gem, explain why you think that ought to be included here, instead of changing it without reason nor announcement.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm jasgkzab for dinner
Alright, first of all I agree with some of the points you made, however as you can see in the page history there were multiple edit wars, I bet someone will undo your changes to the left version some time later, however the lefty version isn't entirely wrong and I thought making two versions of the same page would be a good solution to settle this down (turns out it wasn't), I think soot should either lock this page or hire some mods, also the page that you made might need to be altered (not rewritten) a little bit to be more unbiased (?).
also you removed the snopes link and "this has been debunked" from the page, I think this is unnecessary.
it is irrelevant that some ip user will change it, i or anyone else can just change it back. and also, i dont even care what the facts are, its funnier the way it is as its clearly triggering some faggots to edit it. if anyone actually cared theyd probably have checked kym for their biased article. the admin needs to just give the users who actually contribute sysop ability, and allow us to ban ips from editing this page. dont cuck out to the trannies by editing the page, if they change it just change it back. i did actually find the snopes link funny, but i removed the snopes link because it works in the trannies aid. and snopes is notoriously biased. so as they cant even say we are wrong it basically confirms that it was in fact democrat. keep that off, and allow the article to be based.
i have reconsidered what i said, going to write the actual history of this too, but keep what was already as the opening. if you want to write then do it, but be sure to ensure that the article still gives the reactions as it does now.
Why are you guys such faggots? Why can't you accept that someone might disagree with you and just want to force a narrative down people's throats? What happened to so-called free speech? For the record I'm for the splitting of the article in two, makes it funnier that way and makes it clear to visitors that there isn't just one narrative when it comes to this shitty meme.
already written the new version. dont you dare try to change it, incel. not sure why you want visitors who are faggots and post this meme unironically. we are for one narrative, the true narrative which has been well written in this article.
Fuck off, cuck. If you don't like people challenging your claims actually post some sources or shut up.
not a cuck. a cuck would allow trannies like you to edit this article to have their gay version instead of the good version. youre the cuck here, that or youre pretending to not be doing this for other reasons. anyway you use ip therefore invalid
You're a cuck. You're too afraid of people finding out the truth you desperately want to force a narrative down their throat. No one is a tranny here but you.
what truth? what are you talking about? youre the tranny btw lol
Still no argument, LMAO. Anyway, keep showing us how much "not a tranny cuck" you are by crying to the janny for help.
so you think there ought to be no rules, and that every page which gets vandalised ought to be allowed? lol good argument retard
It's not your personal club, cuck.
nor is it yours. we dont want you faggots here. leave
it has been established that we do not want you version here. give up, incel
Holy shit is this ever gonna end, now that I look at it adding the two versions into a singular page was the best idea, but some schizo thought that trannies were the ones who kept editing the page, please take meds.
MEDS AND BBC THERAPY NOW SOOT LOCK THE PAGE
lol everyone arguing and shit and i havent read neither of the versions lol
soot, if you decide to lock the thread again, make sure to keep the bias template. it's barely used at the moment, and this is one of the few pages where it actually belongs
how does it belong here? what bias is there? if you read the article, youll realise that everything which was written is a fact. with the registered democrat, snopes didnt even say that was false, which basically confirms it was true. and that doesnt matter because this wiki is for the history of soi posting, some american school shooters politics isnt relevant here. make a new template saying that this article is backed up by peer reviewed studies.
gem, just why?
honestly I don't know at this point, I think we should let soot decide.
i think youre being a cuck, if you dont care about which one it is i shall probably change it back. stop cucking out to these retards
chudjak... the most edited entry on the wiki. sovl...
It seems like soot has finally decided to lock this page.
I love sex
Anyone else can't help but masturbate at least once an hour or so? i haven't fapped in 7 months coomer, repent and sin no more.
lol I look like this
yall need sex
soot fix
Introduction
Can we add a politically-neutral introduction to the page? Something like "Chudjak is a Soyjak with strong political beliefs (which you disagree with). He can often be found on /pol/, /leftypol/, and in your mirror."
i somewhat support this because 1) it sounds funnier 2) the current introduction is a fucking wall of text that needs to be broken up in paragraphs anyway
