Template talk:Brimstone

I'm trying to figure out the appropriate usage for this template. I've originally intended this template to be for articles that are extremely low quality and pretty much need a complete rewrite but it turns out there aren't that many examples that come to mind. Another use I can think of is tagging pages about brimmy topics but the problem is these pages can actually be well-written. What do you think? --Tefal (talk) 12:34, 7 September 2023 (EST)

I think the best way to use this is to mark pages that will never become gems no matter how much effort is put into them --Tefal (talk) 12:56, 7 September 2023 (EST)

I like the way it turned out so far. Concerning original intent, we have Template:Delete for really shitty articles, so it would've been redundant.

>but the problem is these pages can actually be well-written.

Yeah but the topic is brimstone. I believe marking all the sulphuric topics as brim is funny and useful, especially in the long term. Maybe, if there's a gem about a brim, someone could add both the gem and brimstone template. They could even make a brimerald template if they're autistic enough. --SprokemowerMan (talk) 17:43, 7 September 2023 (EST)

dropped some new images, thoughts?

i really like this template, gem

change the word brimstone to redtext as well? more dramatic imo

>Since it's placed on articles You or the hivemind don't like, essentially a downvote. And that's... LE BAD! But seriously, this template is supposed to be placed based on the topic of the article, and not the quality of the article itself. If you disagree, you can just remove the template from the article --TefalPhoneposting (talk) 20:11, 23 September 2023 (EST)