Talk:Hunterrules0 o: Difference between revisions
From Soyjak Wiki, The Free Soycyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Cypherpunks (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We have one for ultradan someone who is even less releated to the sharty. so why dont we have someone whose acutally has more of a connection to the sharty hes mentioned in the wiki page of fnac | We have one for ultradan someone who is even less releated to the sharty. so why dont we have someone whose acutally has more of a connection to the sharty hes mentioned in the wiki page of fnac | ||
: Seeing as the only relevant connection to Hunterrules0_o is FNAC, it should be enough as a section in the [[FNAC]] article. Unless you're writing a page that's long enough that it would be better as an article. But currently it fits in a section. [[User:Cypherpunks|Cypherpunks]] ([[User talk:Cypherpunks|talk]]) 12:29, 15 March 2024 (EST) | : Seeing as the only relevant connection to Hunterrules0_o is FNAC, it should be enough as a section in the [[FNAC]] article. Unless you're writing a page that's long enough that it would be better as an article. But currently it fits in a section. [[User:Cypherpunks|Cypherpunks]] ([[User talk:Cypherpunks|talk]]) 12:29, 15 March 2024 (EST) | ||
True then. your right I was just trying to add more to the fnac article on streamers. | |||
Latest revision as of 13:07, 15 March 2024
We have one for ultradan someone who is even less releated to the sharty. so why dont we have someone whose acutally has more of a connection to the sharty hes mentioned in the wiki page of fnac
- Seeing as the only relevant connection to Hunterrules0_o is FNAC, it should be enough as a section in the FNAC article. Unless you're writing a page that's long enough that it would be better as an article. But currently it fits in a section. Cypherpunks (talk) 12:29, 15 March 2024 (EST)
True then. your right I was just trying to add more to the fnac article on streamers.
