Talk:SoyDoom: Difference between revisions
UltraSoyLord (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Response to UltraSoyLord; Petitions to Angeleno) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I understand it is upsetting when people are critical of something you put effort into, but the response towards the addition of the "controversy" section hasn't done Project Soy any favors. The edits have done nothing but make you people out as childish and emotional. While the current edit may not seem to be unbiased from your point of view, it is generous if anything. If you want to prove to be above the situation, I would advice accepting that it happened and it made you look extremely bad and not only move on but go out of your way to show you regret it happened. By doubling down, you dug your hole deeper. I can't stop you from editing it, but I really wouldn't... | I understand it is upsetting when people are critical of something you put effort into, but the response towards the addition of the "controversy" section hasn't done Project Soy any favors. The edits have done nothing but make you people out as childish and emotional. While the current edit may not seem to be unbiased from your point of view, it is generous if anything. If you want to prove to be above the situation, I would advice accepting that it happened and it made you look extremely bad and not only move on but go out of your way to show you regret it happened. By doubling down, you dug your hole deeper. I can't stop you from editing it, but I really wouldn't... | ||
UltraSoyLord, I have tried to remove any bias with my previous edits, but the problem is that DoomArchiver is treating the article like a personal blog at this point. There are also some editors who are adding too much anti-Soydoom bias. I now understand that the semi-biased current edits more accurately reflect the general opinions of the Party. My intentions are to capture both sides of the story. Thank you for adding the anti-SoyDoom side. | |||
As for suggested edits: Angeleno, please move the content Public Versions / Branches section to another page titled "Public Wads of Doom: Project Soy" and link to it from this page. I believe it is adding unnecessary bloat, and can only get more bloated continuing on. | |||
Also, please fix the typos in the Matrix section. There are a few of them. | |||
--[[User:SprokemowerMan|SprokemowerMan]] ([[User talk:SprokemowerMan|talk]]) 17:05, 6 February 2023 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 17:05, 6 February 2023
remove the trooncord off site links angeleno its fucking tranny coal
I understand it is upsetting when people are critical of something you put effort into, but the response towards the addition of the "controversy" section hasn't done Project Soy any favors. The edits have done nothing but make you people out as childish and emotional. While the current edit may not seem to be unbiased from your point of view, it is generous if anything. If you want to prove to be above the situation, I would advice accepting that it happened and it made you look extremely bad and not only move on but go out of your way to show you regret it happened. By doubling down, you dug your hole deeper. I can't stop you from editing it, but I really wouldn't...
UltraSoyLord, I have tried to remove any bias with my previous edits, but the problem is that DoomArchiver is treating the article like a personal blog at this point. There are also some editors who are adding too much anti-Soydoom bias. I now understand that the semi-biased current edits more accurately reflect the general opinions of the Party. My intentions are to capture both sides of the story. Thank you for adding the anti-SoyDoom side. As for suggested edits: Angeleno, please move the content Public Versions / Branches section to another page titled "Public Wads of Doom: Project Soy" and link to it from this page. I believe it is adding unnecessary bloat, and can only get more bloated continuing on. Also, please fix the typos in the Matrix section. There are a few of them. --SprokemowerMan (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2023 (EST)
