User talk:Sir Gemerald Bleu: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[File:Screenshot 2024-03-30 at 02-08-21 New vausherald on b https boards.4chan.org b thread 916106779Post some bait with jaks to get 4cuckers uppity.png|thumb|right|Source]] | [[File:Screenshot 2024-03-30 at 02-08-21 New vausherald on b https boards.4chan.org b thread 916106779Post some bait with jaks to get 4cuckers uppity.png|thumb|right|Source]] | ||
<br></br> | |||
{{Quote|>I am also the author of a series of posts named Surviving the /qa/ Coaltalogue}} | |||
Gem --[[User:SprokemowerMan|SprokemowerMan]] ([[User talk:SprokemowerMan|talk]]) 18:35, 21 April 2024 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 18:36, 21 April 2024
Soyspeak.
Is there any way I could talk with you in private?
Sure, even though I don't know if the Wiki has a PM feature or something or whatever. What do you suggest?
Flooding reports
I saw your post on the 'farm where you showed off how you like to report posts on /q/ en masse for being off-topic. Since I don't have a 'farm account I'm just gonna reply here. Report flooding is a retarded thing to do, because if somebody uploads actual rule-breaking material like 'p, and someone sends in a report, the janny wont see it because of the mass influx of signed reports from /q/ which you deem to be off topic. And considering Froot said the jannies ignore your reports anyways, I see no reason in making a janny's 0$ per hour job any more difficult than it has to be by making it harder for them to remove actual rule-breaking crap.
>No nametrooning on the 'iki on my watch Even doe i made the first vaush thread you selfish little god + you didnt even add anything to the page + I was there raiding for 6 hours + You have no Rizz + Theres a nametroon on the Operation 9/11 Page Meds. You can't singlehandedly claim credit for a raid.
>I am also the author of a series of posts named Surviving the /qa/ Coaltalogue
Gem --SprokemowerMan (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2024 (EST)