Talk:Chudjak: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
lol trannies are raging at this article. whats the best way to get soot to make it a protected page, or ban editing of it entirely? | lol trannies are raging at this article. whats the best way to get soot to make it a protected page, or ban editing of it entirely? | ||
keep the snope links off, it only is for benefit of the trannies. or at least argue against it here. they keep vandalising the page so soot must be made to protect it. |
Revision as of 18:08, 4 April 2021
based keep that snopes link on here thats hilarious
so /pol/ has been spamming the registered democrat shit even though chud had no known political affiliation? lol
its not really /pol/ doing this, unless youre one of those trannies on /qa/ who think every racist on 4chan is a /pol/ cross boarder. anyway there have been multiple peer-reviewed studies which suggest that it was democrat.
The older version was better.
of this article without the snopes link? what does it even say in that?
oh i just looked at it, yeah the original version was better. i might change it back. this version has a sort of passive aggressive tone which really doesnt work well.
lol trannies are raging at this article. whats the best way to get soot to make it a protected page, or ban editing of it entirely?
keep the snope links off, it only is for benefit of the trannies. or at least argue against it here. they keep vandalising the page so soot must be made to protect it.