Talk:Dancing swede.mp4: Difference between revisions
From Soyjak Wiki, The Free Soycyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I somewhat agree with you, but I think removing these will reduce the quality of the article. The article was already written and most people saw it in its current state, what we can do is prevent doing that in the future rather than removing these sections. <b><span style="color:cyan">[[User:Gem|GEM]]</span></b> ([[User talk:Gem|talk]]) 11:03, 6 November 2022 (MST) | :I somewhat agree with you, but I think removing these will reduce the quality of the article. The article was already written and most people saw it in its current state, what we can do is prevent doing that in the future rather than removing these sections. <b><span style="color:cyan">[[User:Gem|GEM]]</span></b> ([[User talk:Gem|talk]]) 11:03, 6 November 2022 (MST) | ||
::That's honestly a good thought. Removing those paragraphs would remove much of the info, especially the stuff about goth and possibly the origins of soyteens accusing videos of being 'p. A rewrite is definitely warranted though. [[User:Angeleno|Angeleno]] ([[User talk:Angeleno|talk]]) 13:29, 6 November 2022 (MST) | ::That's honestly a good thought. Removing those paragraphs would remove much of the info, especially the stuff about goth and possibly the origins of soyteens accusing videos of being 'p. A rewrite is definitely warranted though. [[User:Angeleno|Angeleno]] ([[User talk:Angeleno|talk]]) 13:29, 6 November 2022 (MST) | ||
:::Ok I've decided what I'm going to do. I'm going to re-write it to make it look more like [[screamer:Dancing_swede.mp4|Screamer Wiki's version of the page]], as I believe that version does a pretty good job at not being some trophy. [[User:Angeleno|Angeleno]] ([[User talk:Angeleno|talk]]) 15:39, 10 November 2022 (MST) | |||
Revision as of 17:39, 10 November 2022
Delete everything under "Psychological impact"
I don't think there is a need for the article to serve as some sort of trophy for people who spam child porn. Each "event" is catalogued with paragraph after paragraph detailing reactions to seeing child rape. Its enough for people to just know what it is. For clarity, I am talking about sections, Psychological impact, Copycats, Perpetrator, "Cobbys Playpen" incident, and "break the rules roulette" incident.
- I somewhat agree with you, but I think removing these will reduce the quality of the article. The article was already written and most people saw it in its current state, what we can do is prevent doing that in the future rather than removing these sections. GEM (talk) 11:03, 6 November 2022 (MST)
- That's honestly a good thought. Removing those paragraphs would remove much of the info, especially the stuff about goth and possibly the origins of soyteens accusing videos of being 'p. A rewrite is definitely warranted though. Angeleno (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2022 (MST)
- Ok I've decided what I'm going to do. I'm going to re-write it to make it look more like Screamer Wiki's version of the page, as I believe that version does a pretty good job at not being some trophy. Angeleno (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2022 (MST)
- That's honestly a good thought. Removing those paragraphs would remove much of the info, especially the stuff about goth and possibly the origins of soyteens accusing videos of being 'p. A rewrite is definitely warranted though. Angeleno (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2022 (MST)
