Sage: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A sage is a way of posting in a thread without bumping it. On 4cuck, saging is possible by typing “sage” into the “Options” field. It used to show that you saged by setting the email to "sage," but eventually that feature was removed when the e-mail field was removed. On the sharty, you can sage a post the same way you do on 4cuck, | A sage is a way of posting in a thread without bumping it. On 4cuck, saging is possible by typing “sage” into the “Options” field. It used to show that you saged by setting the email to "sage," but eventually that feature was removed when the e-mail field was removed. On the sharty, you can sage a post the same way you do on 4cuck, which works the way 4chan used to before the email-field was removed, to indicate your disapproval of the thread you’re posting in. | ||
== Reasons to Sage == | == Reasons to Sage == | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 1 December 2022
A sage is a way of posting in a thread without bumping it. On 4cuck, saging is possible by typing “sage” into the “Options” field. It used to show that you saged by setting the email to "sage," but eventually that feature was removed when the e-mail field was removed. On the sharty, you can sage a post the same way you do on 4cuck, which works the way 4chan used to before the email-field was removed, to indicate your disapproval of the thread you’re posting in.
Reasons to Sage
- You want others to know that it’s a bait thread
- you want others to know that OP should kill xerself
Is Saging Effective?
Not really. Saging is what peaceful protests are to violent revolution. In other words, attempting to derail a shitty thread is usually a better (and gemmier) option. For 4cuck ‘jakkers, it usually means a whole lot of soydueling and mass replying. On the ‘arty, it’s usually either dotspam (in the Soot era[1]), counter-coalposting, or, rarely, counter-gemcrafting.
- ↑ Under Kuz’s reign, dotspam and similar spam like it became far less common
