Talk:Chudjak: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Alright, first of all I agree with some of the points you made, however as you can see in the page history there were multiple edit wars, I bet someone will undo your changes to the left version some time later, however the lefty version isn't entirely wrong and I thought making two versions of the same page would be a good solution to settle this down (turns out it wasn't), I think soot should either lock this page or hire some mods, also the page that you made might need to be altered (not rewritten) a little bit to be more unbiased (?). | Alright, first of all I agree with some of the points you made, however as you can see in the page history there were multiple edit wars, I bet someone will undo your changes to the left version some time later, however the lefty version isn't entirely wrong and I thought making two versions of the same page would be a good solution to settle this down (turns out it wasn't), I think soot should either lock this page or hire some mods, also the page that you made might need to be altered (not rewritten) a little bit to be more unbiased (?). | ||
also you removed the snopes link and "this has been debunked" from the page, I think this is unnecessary. | |||
Revision as of 10:39, 6 April 2021
based keep that snopes link on here thats hilarious
so /pol/ has been spamming the registered democrat shit even though chud had no known political affiliation? lol
its not really /pol/ doing this, unless youre one of those trannies on /qa/ who think every racist on 4chan is a /pol/ cross boarder. anyway there have been multiple peer-reviewed studies which suggest that it was democrat.
The older version was better.
of this article without the snopes link? what does it even say in that?
oh i just looked at it, yeah the original version was better. i might change it back. this version has a sort of passive aggressive tone which really doesnt work well.
lol trannies are raging at this article. whats the best way to get soot to make it a protected page, or ban editing of it entirely?
keep the snope links off, it only is for benefit of the trannies. or at least argue against it here. they keep vandalising the page so soot must be made to protect it.
yikes, just yikes
It seems like this flame war is never gonna end, should we divide this page or ???
no, it shall stay how it was originally written. shall change it back. considering soot banned kara boga from his site its a rather odd move of him to allow these trannies to fuck around with his wiki. not sure what the fuck hes doing tbh, possibly trying to appease them? this wiki is clearly a joke, so anyone who would change it like that is clearly raging at the article, not because they actually care about the quality of this website. soot needs to lock the page to what it was previously.
gem, explain why you think that ought to be included here, instead of changing it without reason nor announcement.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm jasgkzab for dinner
Alright, first of all I agree with some of the points you made, however as you can see in the page history there were multiple edit wars, I bet someone will undo your changes to the left version some time later, however the lefty version isn't entirely wrong and I thought making two versions of the same page would be a good solution to settle this down (turns out it wasn't), I think soot should either lock this page or hire some mods, also the page that you made might need to be altered (not rewritten) a little bit to be more unbiased (?).
also you removed the snopes link and "this has been debunked" from the page, I think this is unnecessary.
