Talk:Chudjak
SOOT LOCK THE PAGE based keep that snopes link on here thats hilarious
so /pol/ has been spamming the registered democrat shit even though chud had no known political affiliation? lol
its not really /pol/ doing this, unless youre one of those trannies on /qa/ who think every racist on 4chan is a /pol/ cross boarder. anyway there have been multiple peer-reviewed studies which suggest that it was democrat.
The older version was better.
of this article without the snopes link? what does it even say in that?
oh i just looked at it, yeah the original version was better. i might change it back. this version has a sort of passive aggressive tone which really doesnt work well.
lol trannies are raging at this article. whats the best way to get soot to make it a protected page, or ban editing of it entirely?
keep the snope links off, it only is for benefit of the trannies. or at least argue against it here. they keep vandalising the page so soot must be made to protect it.
yikes, just yikes
It seems like this flame war is never gonna end, should we divide this page or ???
no, it shall stay how it was originally written. shall change it back. considering soot banned kara boga from his site its a rather odd move of him to allow these trannies to fuck around with his wiki. not sure what the fuck hes doing tbh, possibly trying to appease them? this wiki is clearly a joke, so anyone who would change it like that is clearly raging at the article, not because they actually care about the quality of this website. soot needs to lock the page to what it was previously.
gem, explain why you think that ought to be included here, instead of changing it without reason nor announcement.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm jasgkzab for dinner
Alright, first of all I agree with some of the points you made, however as you can see in the page history there were multiple edit wars, I bet someone will undo your changes to the left version some time later, however the lefty version isn't entirely wrong and I thought making two versions of the same page would be a good solution to settle this down (turns out it wasn't), I think soot should either lock this page or hire some mods, also the page that you made might need to be altered (not rewritten) a little bit to be more unbiased (?).
also you removed the snopes link and "this has been debunked" from the page, I think this is unnecessary.
it is irrelevant that some ip user will change it, i or anyone else can just change it back. and also, i dont even care what the facts are, its funnier the way it is as its clearly triggering some faggots to edit it. if anyone actually cared theyd probably have checked kym for their biased article. the admin needs to just give the users who actually contribute sysop ability, and allow us to ban ips from editing this page. dont cuck out to the trannies by editing the page, if they change it just change it back. i did actually find the snopes link funny, but i removed the snopes link because it works in the trannies aid. and snopes is notoriously biased. so as they cant even say we are wrong it basically confirms that it was in fact democrat. keep that off, and allow the article to be based.
i have reconsidered what i said, going to write the actual history of this too, but keep what was already as the opening. if you want to write then do it, but be sure to ensure that the article still gives the reactions as it does now.
Why are you guys such faggots? Why can't you accept that someone might disagree with you and just want to force a narrative down people's throats? What happened to so-called free speech? For the record I'm for the splitting of the article in two, makes it funnier that way and makes it clear to visitors that there isn't just one narrative when it comes to this shitty meme.
already written the new version. dont you dare try to change it, incel. not sure why you want visitors who are faggots and post this meme unironically. we are for one narrative, the true narrative which has been well written in this article.
Fuck off, cuck. If you don't like people challenging your claims actually post some sources or shut up.
not a cuck. a cuck would allow trannies like you to edit this article to have their gay version instead of the good version. youre the cuck here, that or youre pretending to not be doing this for other reasons. anyway you use ip therefore invalid
You're a cuck. You're too afraid of people finding out the truth you desperately want to force a narrative down their throat. No one is a tranny here but you.
what truth? what are you talking about? youre the tranny btw lol
Still no argument, LMAO. Anyway, keep showing us how much "not a tranny cuck" you are by crying to the janny for help.
so you think there ought to be no rules, and that every page which gets vandalised ought to be allowed? lol good argument retard
It's not your personal club, cuck.
nor is it yours. we dont want you faggots here. leave
MEDS AND BBC THERAPY NOW SOOT LOCK THE PAGE
