Talk:Ijak: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
Tag: Rollback |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''I've created the first pass at this article. It needs the following:''' | '''I've created the first pass at this article. It needs the following:''' | ||
<s>* Screenshots or an archived version of what was https://soyjak.party/soy/thread/3892525.html from July 14, 2023</s> | <s>* Screenshots or an archived version of what was https://soyjak.party/soy/thread/3892525.html from July 14, 2023</s> |
Revision as of 15:19, 20 August 2023
I've created the first pass at this article. It needs the following:
* Screenshots or an archived version of what was https://soyjak.party/soy/thread/3892525.html from July 14, 2023
:: why however
- Tightened up verbiage and expanded descriptions
* The actual Chinese characters from the screenshot
- Overall gemmy additions
Thank (You) for contributing!
--MataDesktop (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2023 (EST)
I can't wait for us to finally reach post 950311737 and indirectly debunk this entire page
The article has low-value images
"Resist the temptation to overwhelm an article with images of marginal value simply because many images are available." -- The Wikipedia manual of style advises
A lot of pictures were just added.
- The article doesn't need the picture of the 1st post of the thread. The only relevant part of it is the caption, which can be conveyed in the article content. Images conveying textual content is considered bad style in Wikipedia.
- The nesting is also ugly and complicated.
- A cropped out ljak from the screenshot of post 950311737 (now the first image of the article) should not be a separate image, as it does not show new information.
oh my god who the hell cares
>You WILL NOT post the full-resolution ijak because it would BREAK THE TIME-SPACE CONTINUUM and KILL GRANDMA you SELFISH LITTLE FUCK
- you do not have a full-resolution ljak however
>Resist the temptation to overwhelm an article with images of marginal value simply because many images are available.
ywnbaw (thanks) everybody cares
>What do you mean it makes the article worse.
>I SPENT OVER 9000 HOURS IN GIMP CROPPING THOSE SCREENSHOTS YOU KNOW
>ACTUALLY I SPENT OVER 9000 GPU CYCLES USING AI UPREZ SOFTWARE TO SCALE IT UP AFTER SPENDING OVER 9000 HOURS IN GIMP CROPPING SCREENSHOTS
Hahahahaha you know ai upscaling isn't real hahaha it just makes stuff up