Talk:Jak.soy
Pages on "splinters"
I've tried to keep a more lax view on keeping up pages when it concerns splinter sites recently. When I very first bought the wiki, I fully allowed pages about splinter sites (despite large amounts of blankings), but people started to link to the wiki page to advertise their splinter in a way such as "stop posting on the 'party, come post here instead https://soyjak.wiki/Splinter_Site" so the hardlined approach on splinters happened. Kolyma policy also prevented mentioning certain splinters at the time (Soyjak wiki attempts to mirror Kolyma policy and soyjak.party rules). I kept this hardlined approach even after Kolyma became more lax on that rule, but later let the sidson.city page stay up after realizing that Vinluv was able to post about it freely in /q/ and other spaces. This leaves the original idea on how to moderate pages on splinter sites up in the air.
I would like to know what the rest of the wiki believes should be the policy on splinters. I'm not deleting this page, as the site definitely has a history with the party. Angeleno (talk) 03:37, 22 February 2023 (EST)
>This page doesn't exist (at least at the moment). If you're looking for something else, you can search for this page title in other pages or search the related logs.
>If what you were looking for warrants a page, YOU WILL create this page! marge. User:Lilchuddy
Regarding Lilchuddy's edit
Screamer Wiki also says it is owned by Arizona (whoever that is, I don't use discord). I re-created this page to document the some basic facts about the site without rumors. It's by permitting rumor that you get longer, extremely dusty pages whose content is only of importance to certain cliques, like the page Sobot. Avoiding rumor sometimes means taking the information presented on the site at face value, such as the username of the Administrator.
Angeleno
I vaguely remenber that Angeleno was involved in this splinter, possibly as a co-admin or something, anyone else remenber this?
Repeated deletion of Jak.soy
Why did you delete the page again, User:Angeleno? The closest rule that could justify its deletion, 5 "advertising", I think, doesn't apply to the newest version of the page. Cliffsend (talk) 08:10, 21 July 2023 (EST)
- The page was originally deleted by request of some in soyjak.party. --Angeleno (talk) 13:35, 21 July 2023 (EST)
found ad on it
i saw an ad on it on crystal.cafe . it led to the site but most posts were retarded and contained middle eastern flags
post was deleted by the cafe soon after
