Did Vaush just BTFO?

>wordswordswords

---

left can't meme

This man lives RENT FREE in /pol/. Learn his secret NOW!

The Vaush copypasta and it's subvariants have been scientifically proven by peer-reviewed studies to generate the most (You)s on almost all mildly chud-leaning boards out of any other known copypasta.

This page is meant to be an archive of all known variations of the Vaush copypasta. If you want to add content about the actual streamer, do it on ED or some other chud wiki that isn't IAS-only.

Vaush

Did Vaush just BTFO all of 4chan's 13/50 arguments?

https://youtu.be/psf_rK8DIcs

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving black issues
>Explains how black crimerates have risen since blacks started to move to poor inner city areas after the Irish and the Italians moved out and that crimerates for blacks were previously low in comparison
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have lead black people to commit more crimes.
>Explains how blacks have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how US policies both now and in the past have kept blacks down and how joining criminal gangs is sometimes the only way for blacks to prosper in densely populated poor inner city areas
>Explains how sometimes US policies have been constructed to deliberately to hurt black people even after civil rights
>Explains why the fact that blacks commit more crimes isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that it's all genetic
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about black crime statistics? By all means. watch the whole video. i promise you that you can't debunk it.
>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says oppressing blacks is good
>inb4 someone says bring back slavery
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidence
>inb4 someone links black crime statistics without context and without an analysis of WHY blacks commit more crimes
>inb4 someone calls me a cuck
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES.
i'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are look like they do.

Did Vaush just BTFO Don Turtelli's 'KYS' Arguments?

>Explains how people like Lee aren't interested in barney as a show
>Explains how missed threads have risen since Don started posting outside of /mlp/ after the 8channers and /qa/posters moved out and that missed threads for Don were previously low in comparison
>Explains how bronies have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how Don's policies have previously kept /mlp/ down and how making cheese is the only way for bronies to prosper in densely populated poorly moderated boards
>Explains how sometimes 4chans policies have been constructed to hurt Bronies even after autobanning Lee from /mlp/
>Explains why the fact that bronies are more likely to be gay isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that bronies should 'FUCKING DIE.'
>Everything said in the video is backed by well drawn cheese
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix this

Did Vaush just BTFO all of /soy/'s anti-jarty arguments?

https://youtu.be/ZW9YOMl5mBs {{Greentext|>Explains how people like you aren't interested in posting soyquotes

>Explains how discord troonrates have risen since /soy/ started to focus more on drama after the gemmers moved out and that troonrates on /soy/ were previously low in comparison
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have lead jarty users to spam more ads
>Explains how jarteens have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how sharty jannies both now and in the past have kept jarteens down and how joining /lgbt/ raids is sometimes the only way for jarteens to prosper
>Explains how sometimes sharty rules have been constructed to deliberately to censor jarteens even after the ip leak incident
>Explains why the fact that goth shilled for the jarty isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that jarty supports cp spam
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by lutecord
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about jarty's cp allegation? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says censoring jarty users is good
>inb4 someone says bring back kuz
>inb4 someone posts wiki screenshots
>inb4 someone spams laughing cobson without arrows and without knowing that self inserts are the coal that killed the 'party
>inb4 someone calls me a j*rtyCVCK
>inb4 "muh 0 pph"
>inb4 "sage" because nusoytards is triggered by an unpopular opinion

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open-minded and watch the video instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES. I'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why should I hate jakparty.soy

Did Vaush just BTFO a little boys asshole??

https://www.maptube.com/fuck?v=cI-I1ldP\3I\N

>Explains how his fucking little n-words on the rapestream was tactical and helped BTFO timmy's tight anus
>Explains how he WANTS the horsedick all the way through his youngest cousin
>Explains how his argument "3-year-olds can consent" was actually wanting to gape a three year olds cunt with violent thrusting
>Explains how the chick he groomed on dis-cord was asking for it
>Explains how his clip calling himself a baby boogieman wasn't referring to all MAPs, rather just the ones that dislike him
>Explains how wanting to cumbomb his youngest cousin's holes isn't antisemtic because he's jewish
>explains how he's allowed to fuck moar kids than legally is sound
>all his arguments backed up by extensive porn

What is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about vaush? By all means watch the video, I promise you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links clips/screenshots without context
>inb4 someone calls me a cuck
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

did Vaush just BTFO all of /pol/'s anti-memeflags arguments?

https://youtu.be/psf_rK8DIcs

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving /pol/ issues
>Explains how memeflags jewish takes have risen since baiters realized memeflags got a reaction out of people.
>Explains how socialeconomic factors have lead memeflags to spam more ads
>Explains how memeflags have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how 4chan jannies both now and in the past have kept memeflags down and how joining discord groups is sometimes the only way for memeflags to prosper.
>Explains how jews uses proxies instead of memeflags to appear more convincing.
>Explains why the fact that memeflags are often repostbots isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that they're all propaganda bots
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive lurking
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about memeflags? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says oppressing memeflags is good
>inb4 someone says to remove memeflags from /pol/
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links random threads
>inb4 someone calls me a memeflaggot
>inb4 someone says post nose
>inb4 "muh locations"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

keep the dicussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and dicuss it WITH SOURCES. i'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are look like they do.

Did Vaushtorr just BTFO all of /tg/'s Failbaddon arguments?

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving black legion issues
>Explains how black crusades have risen since black legionnaires started to move to the Imperium Nihilus after the Astronomicon and the Italians moved out and that black crusades for Abaddon were previously fails in comparison
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have lead the black legion to commit more fails..
>Explains how the black legion has been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how Imperium policies both now and in the past have kept the black legion down and how joining warbands is sometimes the only way for black legionnaires to prosper in densely populated poor daemon worlds
>Explains how sometimes Imperial Guard codices have been constructed to deliberately to hurt the black legion even after Cadia
>Explains why the fact that the black legion commits more failed crusades isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that it's all geneseed
>Everything said in the voxcast is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about black legion crusade failures? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says primaris are good
>inb4 someone says bring back Creed
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links black crusade statistics withput context and without an analisys of WHY blacks commit more crimes
>inb4 someone calls me a daemon
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because fa/tg/uy is triggered by a different opinion

Did vaush just BTFO all of 4chan's anti-pedo arguments?

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving sexual consent issues
>Explains how age of sexual consent have risen since pedos started to move to poor inner city areas after the Irish and the shitalians moved out and that age of consent were previously low in comparison
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have lead pedos to commit more crimes.
>Explains how pedos have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how US policies both now and in the past have kept pedos down and how joining grooming gangs is sometimes the only way for pedos to prosper in densely populated poor inner city areas
>Explains how sometimes US policies have been constructed to deliberately to hurt pedos even after civil rights
>Explains why the fact that pedos commit more sex crimes isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that it's all genetic
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about pedo crime statistics? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says oppressing pedos is good
>inb4 someone says bring back pedo lynching
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links pedo crime statistics withput context and without an analisys of WHY blacks commit more crimes
>inb4 someone calls me a cuck
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

Did Vaush just BTFO all of /pol/'s anti vaush arguments?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfvvWw63Yh0

>Explains how his use of the n-word on the killstream was tactical and helped BTFO their arguments
>Explains how he WANTS the horsedick, not to be fucked by one
>Explains how his argument "in favor of child porn" was actually comparing cp to child labor and how they're both bad
>Explains how the chick he groomed on dis-cord was asking for it
>Explains how his clip calling all trannies subhuman wasn't referring to all trannies, rather just the ones that dislike him
>Explains how wanting to bomb israel isn't antisemtic because it's a far right nazi apartheid state
>explains how he's allowed to use faggot/retard because he's bi and autistc
>all his arguments backed up by extensive research

What is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about vaush? By all means watch the video, I promise you can't debunk it.

Other

Did basedjak just BTFO aII of 4chans's anti-basedjak arguments?

>ExpIains how people Iike you aren't interested in creativity
>Explains how /qa/ won
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have led basedjak to become a symboI of creativity
>Explains how 4chan moderators and janitors are trannies whiIe basedjak is not
>ExpIains how board poIicies both now and in the past have kept basedjak posters down and how posting on the sharty is the onIy way for 'jakkers to prosper
>ExpIains how sometimes 4chan poIicies have been constructed to deIiberately to hurt 'jakkers even after the 'jakker rights movement Ied by /qa/
>ExpIains why the fact that Kuz hasn't bought 4cuck isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that he will never buy 4cuck
>Everything said in the image is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about 'jakking? By all means, watch the whole image, I promise you that you can't debunk it. Cope.

>inb4 l get toId to shut the fuck up by someone who is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 "you cope"
>inb4 "muh stfu"
>inb4 "sage" because 4chan tard is triggered by a different opinion

did Voltaire just BTFO all of Rousseau's anti humanist arguments?

https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/fleming-the-works-of-voltaire-a-contemporary-version-in-21-vols

>Explains how Rousseau's claims are supported by his feelings, rather than by reason
>Explains how animals are unable to engage in conversation
>Explains how humans are the only species which can make complex tools
>Explains how conciousness has not been observed in any species other than humans
>Explains how humans are the only species to pick a mate by choice, rather than by instinct.
>Explains how sometimes the French and Prussian government decrees and laws have been used to mock and slander Voltaire.
>Explains why the fact that humans descend from primates doesn't make us the same as a modern primate.
>Everything said in the essay is backed up by scholarly sources
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix modern society

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about Voltaire? By all means, read the whole essay, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't read the essay and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says censoring Voltaire is good
>inb4 someone says bring back Louis XV
>inb4 someone posts r/askphilosophy screenshots
>inb4 someone spams the university dean's office with slanderous mail
>inb4 someone calls me a frog-eater
>inb4 "muh 0 revolutions influenced"
>inb4 "book burned" because Rousseautards are triggered by an unpopular opinion

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open-minded and read the essay instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES. I'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why should I hate Voltaire.

Did Thomas Muller the Bayern baller just BTFO all of /sp/'s shitty arguments?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbocaNsPIV0

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in him breaking the record for the most appearances by an outfield player in the Bundesliga
>Explains how he'll hit 2,000 when he's 68
>Explains how he has the most titles by any German (although Manuel Neuer is near).
>Explains how last three seasons, top assists - him
>Explains how Jamal Musiala is glitched
>Explains how he's won it all and soon an Oscar
>Explains how he's tied with Gerd, may he rest in peace
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to take this mirror off the pitch

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about that he's not the fairest and fittest baller? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 ROH-NAL-DOOOOHHOHOH is better
>inb4 bring back Borussia Dortmund
>inb4 anecdotes
>inb4 someone links Bundesliga stats tables withput context and without an analisys of WHY it's a farmers' league
>inb4 cuck
>inb4 flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /sp/ic is triggered

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES. I'm open to having my mind changed, but only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are look like they do.

Did nick fuentes just BTFO all of /pol/'s arguments about catboys and traps?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W3reKRHcyA0

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving catboy issues
>Explains how catboy suicide rates have risen with transphobia
>Explains how catboys are actually trad
>Explains how catboys and trans persons have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how US policies both now and in the past have kept catboys down and how joining the left is sometimes the only way for xem to prosper
>Explains how ancient greece was totally definitely 100% a catboy haven
>Explains how traps aren't actually that gay
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about the trans suicide epidemic? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says oppressing trans bodies is good
>inb4 someone says get rid of catboys
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links catboy cum statistics without context and without an analisys of WHY catboys cum on fuentes's couch
>inb4 someone calls me a homo
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

keep the dicussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and dicuss it WITH SOURCES. i'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are look like they do.

Did anti-Unironicfag just BTFO all of 4chan’s pro unironic arguments?

>explains how ESLs aren’t interested in being linguistically correct
>explains how unironically is not a word
>explains how socioeconomic factors have led to the degradation of the English language
>explains how dictionaries are largely corrupted and should not be trusted
>explains how unironically is just used as a synonym for literally
>explains how unironic is a double negative
>explains how unironically does not make linguistic since
>explains how the people who say it are terminally online losers
>inb4 didn’t read
>inb4 imagine unironically saying this
>inb4 schizo
>inb4 "sage" because 4chan tard is triggered by a different opinion