Mandate of 'lent: Difference between revisions
Polishkiddo (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 54516 by 216.175.19.98 (talk)) Tags: Removed redirect Undo |
Polishkiddo (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The Mandate of ‘lent is especially useful in arguments as to the true identity of [[Admin 6]]. However, due to many questions as to the various identities of Admins, whether [[Lolkek]] should be counted as one, or whether [[This Is It|Kaguya]] was one (as leaks reveal he shared an inactive Admin account alongside [[Kuz]] and [[Anton Maximov]], several arguments can be made. | The Mandate of ‘lent is especially useful in arguments as to the true identity of [[Admin 6]]. However, due to many questions as to the various identities of Admins, whether [[Lolkek]] should be counted as one, or whether [[This Is It|Kaguya]] was one (as leaks reveal he shared an inactive Admin account alongside [[Kuz]] and [[Anton Maximov]], several arguments can be made. | ||
== See Also == | |||
* [[Splinter War]] | |||
* [[Splintered Age]] | |||
* [[Mandate of 'lent]] | |||
[[Category:Soylitics]] | [[Category:Soylitics]] | ||
Revision as of 10:00, 21 September 2023
Not to be confused with the Mandate of Soy, which was a political philosophy during the Splintered Age.
In sparty political theory, the Mandate of ‘lent is used to determine who is a legitimate Admin of the site. It is based on a traceable genealogy of deliberate transfers of powers, starting from Soot. To date, the Admins which do not have the Mandate of ‘lent are site hijackers: Captain Coal and Captain Cob.
The Mandate of ‘lent is especially useful in arguments as to the true identity of Admin 6. However, due to many questions as to the various identities of Admins, whether Lolkek should be counted as one, or whether Kaguya was one (as leaks reveal he shared an inactive Admin account alongside Kuz and Anton Maximov, several arguments can be made.
