Colorfuljaks: Difference between revisions
From Soyjak Wiki, The Free Soycyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(A revised and updated page.) |
(update) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=== Spam conspiracy theory (debunked) === | === Spam conspiracy theory (debunked) === | ||
[[Schizo|Schizos]] will often call Colorfuljaks [[Schizophrenia|"spam"]] due to the sheer amount of popularity that they've gained through a short period of time, they mainly assert that this surge in Colorfuljak posting can be attributed to one or two users at any given time, however this conspiracy theory has been debunked according to [[Dr. Soystein|scientists]]<ref>[[Main Page]] </ref><ref>[[Main Page]]</ref><ref>[[Main Page]]</ref><ref>[[Main Page]]</ref><ref>[[Main Page]]</ref>. | [[Schizo|Schizos]] will often call Colorfuljaks [[Schizophrenia|"spam"]] due to the sheer amount of popularity that they've gained through a short period of time, they mainly assert that this surge in Colorfuljak posting can be attributed to one or two users at any given time, however this conspiracy theory has been debunked according to [[Dr. Soystein|scientists]]<ref>[[Main Page|CNN "Unfounded conspiracy theory claims the wholesome colorfuljak meme is a gateway to white genocide"]] </ref><ref>[[Main Page|The Anti-Defecation League "Racist internet conspiracy theory claims that colorfuljaks promote racemixing"]]</ref><ref>[[Main Page|Reddit/r/science "No, colorfuljaks are not spam"]]</ref><ref>[[Main Page|BBC "Are colorjaks spam? Fact and fiction."]]</ref><ref>[[Main Page|The washington post]]</ref>. | ||
[[File:Sagetard.png|thumb|The average anti-colorfuljak poster.]] | [[File:Sagetard.png|thumb|The average anti-colorfuljak poster.]] | ||
[[Sweden|Fails]] were quick to call Colorfuljaks [[coal]] and spam reply "sage" due to the fact that they break the norm of 'jaks. | [[Sweden|Fails]] were quick to call Colorfuljaks [[coal]] and spam reply "sage" due to the fact that they break the norm of 'jaks. | ||
Revision as of 08:38, 11 June 2021
Colorfuljaks are the latest gems being posted on soyjak.party that feature existing soyjaks with an exciting and creative new twist, that being color instead of the regular monochrome coal.
Spam conspiracy theory (debunked)
Schizos will often call Colorfuljaks "spam" due to the sheer amount of popularity that they've gained through a short period of time, they mainly assert that this surge in Colorfuljak posting can be attributed to one or two users at any given time, however this conspiracy theory has been debunked according to scientists[1][2][3][4][5].
Fails were quick to call Colorfuljaks coal and spam reply "sage" due to the fact that they break the norm of 'jaks.
- ↑ CNN "Unfounded conspiracy theory claims the wholesome colorfuljak meme is a gateway to white genocide"
- ↑ The Anti-Defecation League "Racist internet conspiracy theory claims that colorfuljaks promote racemixing"
- ↑ Reddit/r/science "No, colorfuljaks are not spam"
- ↑ BBC "Are colorjaks spam? Fact and fiction."
- ↑ The washington post
