List of soyjak.party slang: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(S) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
** Lower than coal. Soulless. | ** Lower than coal. Soulless. | ||
* [[iron]] | * [[iron]] | ||
** | ** goal | ||
* [[rust]] | * [[rust]] | ||
** In-between gem and coal but lower than iron | ** In-between gem and coal but lower than iron | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* tseries/'ries | * tseries/'ries | ||
** coal | ** coal | ||
* diamond | * diamond/'mond | ||
** Highest of highs, higher than even gemerald. Always IAS. | ** Highest of highs, higher than even gemerald. Always IAS. | ||
* ketchup | * ketchup | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
** brimstone | ** brimstone | ||
* dirt | * dirt | ||
** | ** Soulful dust | ||
* garbage | * garbage/rubbish | ||
** Worse than dust but higher than brimstone | ** Worse than dust but higher than brimstone | ||
== Attributives == | |||
These can be added to any slang to describe a post more thoroughly. Attributives are uncommon on the [[Soyjak.party chat|party]] but are sometimes used. For example, a "coalish gem" would describe a post that is a gem with some coal qualities. Note that the line between attributives and prefixes when applied to slang are blurred, for example word combinations such as "coalmerald" are not attributives despite using coal as a prefix and meaning the same thing as "coalish emerald" because attributives don't use prefixes. In addition, some Acronyms such as nas, ias, or tas can be used as attributives, for example a "nas gem" would be a post that is not a soyjak but is still a gem anyways. | |||
* Gemmish | |||
** Describing a post with some gem qualities | |||
* Coalish | |||
** Describing a post with some coal qualities | |||
* Rubyish | |||
** Describing a post with some ruby qualities | |||
* Ironish | |||
** Describing a post with some iron qualities | |||
* Dusty | |||
** Describing a post with some dust qualities | |||
* Rusty | |||
** Describing a post with some rust qualities | |||
* Diamondish | |||
** Describing a post with some diamond qualities | |||
* Dirty | |||
** Describing a post with some dirt qualities | |||
* Trashy | |||
** Describing a post with some garbage qualities | |||
* Hellish | |||
** Describing a post with some brimstone qualities, alternatively "macabre" in reference to gravestone. | |||
== Acronyms == | == Acronyms == | ||
HWABAG: He will always be a gem. | HWABAG: He will always be a gem. |
Revision as of 11:47, 24 April 2022
Slang is frequently used on the party and in the wider community. This often leads to lurkers, new users, and Jackbox streamers being extremely confused about it.
"Good" and "bad" slang
In the beginning, there was only gem. Then came coal as the opposite of gem. From there, countless derivatives have evolved and spun off from the mainline gem-coal spectrum. Kuz supporters and some soyientists claim kuz has credit for starting the trend of alternative rating systems, but this claim is disputed[it just is, ok?].
- gem/'em
- A good thing/concept etc.
- gemerald
- Higher than a gem
- goal/coam/geal/cem
- In-between gem and coal
- coal/'oal
- A bad thing/concept etc.
- dust
- Lower than coal. Soulless.
- iron
- goal
- rust
- In-between gem and coal but lower than iron
- brimstone
- Lower than even dust. Unspeakable. Usually NAS.
- pewds/pewdiepie
- gem
- tseries/'ries
- coal
- diamond/'mond
- Highest of highs, higher than even gemerald. Always IAS.
- ketchup
- gem
- mustard
- coal
- ruby
- In-between gem and coal but higher than iron
- gravestone
- brimstone
- dirt
- Soulful dust
- garbage/rubbish
- Worse than dust but higher than brimstone
Attributives
These can be added to any slang to describe a post more thoroughly. Attributives are uncommon on the party but are sometimes used. For example, a "coalish gem" would describe a post that is a gem with some coal qualities. Note that the line between attributives and prefixes when applied to slang are blurred, for example word combinations such as "coalmerald" are not attributives despite using coal as a prefix and meaning the same thing as "coalish emerald" because attributives don't use prefixes. In addition, some Acronyms such as nas, ias, or tas can be used as attributives, for example a "nas gem" would be a post that is not a soyjak but is still a gem anyways.
- Gemmish
- Describing a post with some gem qualities
- Coalish
- Describing a post with some coal qualities
- Rubyish
- Describing a post with some ruby qualities
- Ironish
- Describing a post with some iron qualities
- Dusty
- Describing a post with some dust qualities
- Rusty
- Describing a post with some rust qualities
- Diamondish
- Describing a post with some diamond qualities
- Dirty
- Describing a post with some dirt qualities
- Trashy
- Describing a post with some garbage qualities
- Hellish
- Describing a post with some brimstone qualities, alternatively "macabre" in reference to gravestone.
Acronyms
HWABAG: He will always be a gem.
HWNBAG: He will never be a gem.
HWABAC: He will always be coal
HWNBAC: He will never be a coal
HWABAS: He will always be a soyjak
HWNBAS: He will never be a soyjak
TSMT: This, so much this
NAS: Not a soyjak
- Alternate meaning: Nice Awesome Soyjak or Not Awesome Soyjak
IAS: Is a soyjak
IAN: Is a nigger
TAS: Technically a soyjak
TNAS: Technically not a soyjak
DFNT: Descriptive File Name Tranny or Descriptive File Name Triumph