Peer-reviewed study: Difference between revisions

From Soyjak Wiki, The Free Soycyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Reverted edits by 185.225.28.131 (talk) to last revision by Gigachad)
Tag: Rollback
(this misinfo has been debooked by sooopes)
Line 5: Line 5:
Peer reviewed studies have helped to show that:
Peer reviewed studies have helped to show that:


* [[Thrembo]] is NOT a real number
* [[Thrembo]] is a real number<ref name=":0" />
* Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat
* Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat
* You should trust the science
* You should trust the science
* Sproke is good for you<ref>Peer reviewed study by The Science</ref>
* Sproke is good for you<ref name=":0">Peer reviewed study by The Science</ref>
* You should trust the Peer-reviewed studies
* You should trust the Peer-reviewed studies



Revision as of 14:46, 23 May 2022

>A peer-reviewed study is a study that has been peer-reviewed.[1][2][3][6][7][10][11][12][15] This is a necessary [4][5] ritual[8] to make information real,[9][13][14] so that it can be used to debunk dumb chuds and schizos who really need to just take their meds

A peer-reviewed study is a study that has been peer-reviewed.[1][2][3][6][7][10][11][12][15] This is a necessary[4][5] ritual[8] to make information real,[9][13][14] so that it can be used to debunk dumb chuds and schizos who really need to just take their meds.

Peer reviewed studies have helped to show that:

  • Thrembo is a real number[1]
  • Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat
  • You should trust the science
  • Sproke is good for you[1]
  • You should trust the Peer-reviewed studies

See also

Citations

  1. 1.0 1.1 Peer reviewed study by The Science