Peer-reviewed study: Difference between revisions

From Soyjak Wiki, The Free Soycyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
* [[Thrembo]] is NOT a real number<ref name=":0" />
* [[Thrembo]] is NOT a real number<ref name=":0" />
* Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat
* Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat
* You should trust the science
* [[You]] should trust the science
* Sproke is good for you<ref name=":0">Peer reviewed study by The Science</ref>
* Sproke is good for you<ref name=":0">Peer reviewed study by The Science</ref>
* Meat is bad for you
* Meat is bad for you

Revision as of 15:17, 20 October 2023

>A peer-reviewed study is a study that has been peer-reviewed.[1][2][3][6][7][10][11][12][15] This is a necessary [4][5] ritual[8] to make information real,[9][13][14] so that it can be used to debunk dumb chuds and schizos who really need to just take their meds. Peer reviewed studies have helped to show that. *Thrembo is a real number. *Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat. *You should trust the science. * Sproke is good for you. *You should trust the Peer-reviewed studies. Peer reviewed study by The Science

A peer-reviewed study is a study that has been peer-reviewed.[1][2][3][6][7][10][11][12][15] This is a necessary[4][5] ritual[8] to make information real,[9][13][14] so that it can be used to debunk dumb chuds and schizos who really need to just take their meds.

Peer reviewed studies have helped to show that:

  • Thrembo is NOT a real number[1]
  • Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat
  • You should trust the science
  • Sproke is good for you[1]
  • Meat is bad for you
  • You should trust the Peer-reviewed studies
  • HWABAG
  • Niggers tongue my anus

See also

Citations

  1. 1.0 1.1 Peer reviewed study by The Science