Peer-reviewed study: Difference between revisions

From Soyjak Wiki, The Free Soycyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
(link didnt work)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Tyronius Floyd.png|thumb|Freshmen at the University of Minnesota attending a lecture on critical BBC theory, 2021 ]]'''Critical BBC Theory (CBBCT)''' is a ficticious unified cosmological theory of everything revolving around the superiority of Big Black Cock (BBC.) According to neo-Nazi right-wing schizophrenic chudcels who forgot to take their meds, CBBCT is a CIA funded form of post-modern liberal propaganda that is taught at all levels K-12 in American public schools. However, according to snopes.com,  there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to indicate that CBBCT indoctrination is actually happening.  
[[File:Medsjak.png|thumb|{{Quote|>A '''peer-reviewed study''' is a study that has been peer-reviewed.<sup>[1][2][3][6][7][10][11][12][15]</sup> This is a necessary <sup>[4][5]</sup> ritual<sup>[8]</sup> to make information real,<sup>[9][13][14]</sup> so that it can be used to debunk dumb chuds and schizos who really need to just take their meds. Peer reviewed studies have helped to show that. *[[Thrembo]] is a real number. *Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat. *You should trust the science. * Sproke is good for you. *You should trust the Peer-reviewed studies. Peer reviewed study by The Science}}]]


== Overview ==
A '''peer-reviewed study''' is a study that has been peer-reviewed.<sup class="noexcerpt">[[Science|[1][2][3][6][7][10][11][12][15]]]</sup> This is a necessary<sup class="noexcerpt">[[Science|[4][5]]]</sup> ritual<sup class="noexcerpt">[[Science|[8]]]</sup> to make information real,<sup class="noexcerpt">[[Science|[9][13][14]]]</sup> so that it can be used to debunk dumb [[Chudjak|chuds]] and [[Schizophrenia|schizos]] who really need to just take their [[meds]].
Even if CBBCT did exist (which it DOES NOT,) no white person would ever be capable of understanding it due to the implicit bias inherent in their subconscious. The only group of people that would be qualified to understand CBBCT (which DOES NOT actually exist,) is Black/Brown inner-city elders who have a doctoral degree in CBBCT from MIT University. These educated Black/brown elders from MIT have scientifically proven that white people would never be able to understand CBBCT (if it even existed in the first place) due to their implicit bias and lack of lived experiences. Thus, speaking speaking about CBBCT as a white person is equivalent to violence against Black Lives.


If CBBCT were real (which IT IS NOT,) then it would be impossible to write down any of its main ideas on paper. Since the white man invented writing, there is no way to write down anything that is not institutionally racist. The only way to learn about CBBCT would be through the oral tradition of the Zulu nation, passed down from generation to generation since the beginning of time.
Peer reviewed studies have helped to show that:
 
* [[Thrembo]] is NOT a real number<ref name=":0" />
* Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat
* [[You]] should trust the science
* Sproke is good for you<ref name=":0">Peer reviewed study by The Science</ref>
* Meat is bad for you
* You should trust the Peer-reviewed studies
*HWABAG
 
==See also==
 
*[[Science]]
*[[Fact|Facts]]
 
== Citations ==
 
{{Science}}

Latest revision as of 20:54, 11 April 2024

>A peer-reviewed study is a study that has been peer-reviewed.[1][2][3][6][7][10][11][12][15] This is a necessary [4][5] ritual[8] to make information real,[9][13][14] so that it can be used to debunk dumb chuds and schizos who really need to just take their meds. Peer reviewed studies have helped to show that. *Thrembo is a real number. *Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat. *You should trust the science. * Sproke is good for you. *You should trust the Peer-reviewed studies. Peer reviewed study by The Science

A peer-reviewed study is a study that has been peer-reviewed.[1][2][3][6][7][10][11][12][15] This is a necessary[4][5] ritual[8] to make information real,[9][13][14] so that it can be used to debunk dumb chuds and schizos who really need to just take their meds.

Peer reviewed studies have helped to show that:

  • Thrembo is NOT a real number[1]
  • Bugs are nutritious and a good alternative to meat
  • You should trust the science
  • Sproke is good for you[1]
  • Meat is bad for you
  • You should trust the Peer-reviewed studies
  • HWABAG

See also

Citations

Peer-reviewed study
is part of a series on
Soyience™
"We are all just hecking star dust or something!"
Peer reviewed sources [-+]
Fields of science [-+]
Science in praxis [-+]
Theoretical branches [-+]
  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Peer reviewed study by The Science
Retrieved from "https://soyjakwiki.net/index.php?title=Peer-reviewed_study&oldid=103314"