Did Vaush just BTFO?

>wordswordswords

---

left can't meme

This man lives RENT FREE in /pol/. Learn his secret NOW!

The Vaush copypasta and it's subvariants have been scientifically proven by peer-reviewed studies to generate the most (You)s on almost all mildly chud-leaning boards out of any other known copypasta.

This page is meant to be an archive of all known variations of the Vaush copypasta. If you want to add content about the actual streamer, do it on ED or some other chud wiki that isn't IAS-only or just go to his Kiwifarms thread.

If you want to post the original copypasta on 4cuck's /pol/, change the subject line and text slightly because posting the unedited pasta will automatically autosage your thread.

Vaush

Did Vaush just BTFO all of 4chan's 13/50 arguments?

https://youtu.be/psf_rK8DIcs

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving black issues
>Explains how black crimerates have risen since blacks started to move to poor inner city areas after the Irish and the Italians moved out and that crimerates for blacks were previously low in comparison
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have lead black people to commit more crimes.
>Explains how blacks have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how US policies both now and in the past have kept blacks down and how joining criminal gangs is sometimes the only way for blacks to prosper in densely populated poor inner city areas
>Explains how sometimes US policies have been constructed to deliberately to hurt black people even after civil rights
>Explains why the fact that blacks commit more crimes isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that it's all genetic
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about black crime statistics? By all means. watch the whole video. i promise you that you can't debunk it.
>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says oppressing blacks is good
>inb4 someone says bring back slavery
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidence
>inb4 someone links black crime statistics without context and without an analysis of WHY blacks commit more crimes
>inb4 someone calls me a cuck
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES.
i'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are look like they do.

Did Vaush just BTFO Don Turtelli's 'KYS' Arguments?

>Explains how people like Lee aren't interested in barney as a show
>Explains how missed threads have risen since Don started posting outside of /mlp/ after the 8channers and /qa/posters moved out and that missed threads for Don were previously low in comparison
>Explains how bronies have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how Don's policies have previously kept /mlp/ down and how making cheese is the only way for bronies to prosper in densely populated poorly moderated boards
>Explains how sometimes 4chans policies have been constructed to hurt Bronies even after autobanning Lee from /mlp/
>Explains why the fact that bronies are more likely to be gay isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that bronies should 'FUCKING DIE.'
>Everything said in the video is backed by well drawn cheese
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix this

Did Vaush just BTFO all of /soy/'s anti-jarty arguments?

https://youtu.be/ZW9YOMl5mBs

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in posting soyquotes
>Explains how discord troonrates have risen since /soy/ started to focus more on drama after the gemmers moved out and that troonrates on /soy/ were previously low in comparison
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have lead jarty users to spam more ads
>Explains how jarteens have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how sharty jannies both now and in the past have kept jarteens down and how joining /lgbt/ raids is sometimes the only way for jarteens to prosper
>Explains how sometimes sharty rules have been constructed to deliberately to censor jarteens even after the ip leak incident
>Explains why the fact that goth shilled for the jarty isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that jarty supports cp spam
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by lutecord
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about jarty's cp allegation? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says censoring jarty users is good
>inb4 someone says bring back kuz
>inb4 someone posts wiki screenshots
>inb4 someone spams laughing cobson without arrows and without knowing that self inserts are the coal that killed the 'party
>inb4 someone calls me a j*rtyCVCK
>inb4 "muh 0 pph"
>inb4 "sage" because nusoytards is triggered by an unpopular opinion

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open-minded and watch the video instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES. I'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why should I hate jakparty.soy

Did Vaush just BTFO a little boys asshole??

https://www.maptube.com/fuck?v=cI-I1ldP\3I\N

>Explains how his fucking little n-words on the rapestream was tactical and helped BTFO timmy's tight anus
>Explains how he WANTS the horsedick all the way through his youngest cousin
>Explains how his argument "3-year-olds can consent" was actually wanting to gape a three year olds cunt with violent thrusting
>Explains how the chick he groomed on dis-cord was asking for it
>Explains how his clip calling himself a baby boogieman wasn't referring to all MAPs, rather just the ones that dislike him
>Explains how wanting to cumbomb his youngest cousin's holes isn't antisemtic because he's jewish
>explains how he's allowed to fuck moar kids than legally is sound
>all his arguments backed up by extensive porn

What is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about vaush? By all means watch the video, I promise you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links clips/screenshots without context
>inb4 someone calls me a cuck
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

did Vaush just BTFO all of /pol/'s anti-memeflags arguments?

https://youtu.be/psf_rK8DIcs

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving /pol/ issues
>Explains how memeflags jewish takes have risen since baiters realized memeflags got a reaction out of people.
>Explains how socialeconomic factors have lead memeflags to spam more ads
>Explains how memeflags have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how 4chan jannies both now and in the past have kept memeflags down and how joining discord groups is sometimes the only way for memeflags to prosper.
>Explains how jews uses proxies instead of memeflags to appear more convincing.
>Explains why the fact that memeflags are often repostbots isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that they're all propaganda bots
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive lurking
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about memeflags? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says oppressing memeflags is good
>inb4 someone says to remove memeflags from /pol/
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links random threads
>inb4 someone calls me a memeflaggot
>inb4 someone says post nose
>inb4 "muh locations"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

keep the dicussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and dicuss it WITH SOURCES. i'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are look like they do.

Did Vaushtorr just BTFO all of /tg/'s Failbaddon arguments?

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving black legion issues
>Explains how black crusades have risen since black legionnaires started to move to the Imperium Nihilus after the Astronomicon and the Italians moved out and that black crusades for Abaddon were previously fails in comparison
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have lead the black legion to commit more fails..
>Explains how the black legion has been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how Imperium policies both now and in the past have kept the black legion down and how joining warbands is sometimes the only way for black legionnaires to prosper in densely populated poor daemon worlds
>Explains how sometimes Imperial Guard codices have been constructed to deliberately to hurt the black legion even after Cadia
>Explains why the fact that the black legion commits more failed crusades isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that it's all geneseed
>Everything said in the voxcast is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about black legion crusade failures? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says primaris are good
>inb4 someone says bring back Creed
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links black crusade statistics withput context and without an analisys of WHY blacks commit more crimes
>inb4 someone calls me a daemon
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because fa/tg/uy is triggered by a different opinion

Did Vaush just BTFO all of 4chan's anti-pedo arguments?

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving sexual consent issues
>Explains how age of sexual consent have risen since pedos started to move to poor inner city areas after the Irish and the shitalians moved out and that age of consent were previously low in comparison
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have lead pedos to commit more crimes.
>Explains how pedos have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how US policies both now and in the past have kept pedos down and how joining grooming gangs is sometimes the only way for pedos to prosper in densely populated poor inner city areas
>Explains how sometimes US policies have been constructed to deliberately to hurt pedos even after civil rights
>Explains why the fact that pedos commit more sex crimes isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that it's all genetic
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about pedo crime statistics? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says oppressing pedos is good
>inb4 someone says bring back pedo lynching
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links pedo crime statistics withput context and without an analisys of WHY blacks commit more crimes
>inb4 someone calls me a cuck
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

Did Vaush just BTFO all of /pol/'s anti vaush arguments?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfvvWw63Yh0

>Explains how his use of the n-word on the killstream was tactical and helped BTFO their arguments
>Explains how he WANTS the horsedick, not to be fucked by one
>Explains how his argument "in favor of child porn" was actually comparing cp to child labor and how they're both bad
>Explains how the chick he groomed on dis-cord was asking for it
>Explains how his clip calling all trannies subhuman wasn't referring to all trannies, rather just the ones that dislike him
>Explains how wanting to bomb israel isn't antisemtic because it's a far right nazi apartheid state
>explains how he's allowed to use faggot/retard because he's bi and autistc
>all his arguments backed up by extensive research

What is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about vaush? By all means watch the video, I promise you can't debunk it.

Other

Did basedjak just BTFO all of 4chans's anti-basedjak arguments?

>ExpIains how people Iike you aren't interested in creativity
>Explains how /qa/ won
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have led basedjak to become a symboI of creativity
>Explains how 4chan moderators and janitors are trannies whiIe basedjak is not
>ExpIains how board poIicies both now and in the past have kept basedjak posters down and how posting on the sharty is the onIy way for 'jakkers to prosper
>ExpIains how sometimes 4chan poIicies have been constructed to deIiberately to hurt 'jakkers even after the 'jakker rights movement Ied by /qa/
>ExpIains why the fact that Kuz hasn't bought 4cuck isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that he will never buy 4cuck
>Everything said in the image is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about 'jakking? By all means, watch the whole image, I promise you that you can't debunk it. Cope.

>inb4 l get toId to shut the fuck up by someone who is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 "you cope"
>inb4 "muh stfu"
>inb4 "sage" because 4chan tard is triggered by a different opinion

Did Mike Enoch just BTFO all of leftypol's race denial bullshit?

Did Mike Enoch just BTFO all of leftypol's race denial bullshit?

https://therightstuff.biz/2022/11/23/tds971/
>Dismantles arguments about poverty causing crime
>Dismantles the idea that there wasn't enough time for iq differences to evolve
>Explains how the mainstream media is run by jews who push race denial so they can outcompete whites
>Explains the entire history of the concept of race
>How capitalism oppresses white people by importing nonwhites and using them to break up unions and lower wages
>Explains how marxism is the fools socialism

How do (You) refute all these arguments? He literally actually has the brain to back his arguments up instead of just "MUH CHUUUDS"
>inb4 sage
>inb4 people bring up Lewontin or some dumb shit
>inb4 someone says nonwhites are superior because tbp or some dumb shit like that

Actually refute his arguments... I'll wait.

Did Hitler just BTFO all of nigger's anti-White arguements?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ3N_2r6R-o

>Explains how niggers like you aren't interested in getting off welfare
>Explains how rich blacks commit crimes at a far higher rate than even the poorest of Whites
>Explains how biology has lead to Whites being the superior race
>Explains how Whites have built every significant civilization
>Explains how colonialism benefitted both countries involved
>Explains how modern US policies have been constructed to worship niggers
>Explains why White Supremacy is the framework that the United States was built upon
>Gives concrete solutions on how to maintain White Supremacy worldwide

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about 6 million dead jews? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says niggers are good
>inb4 someone says slavery is bad
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidence
>inb4 someone calls me a chud
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because niggercommie is triggered by a different opinion

did Voltaire just BTFO all of Rousseau's anti humanist arguments?

https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/fleming-the-works-of-voltaire-a-contemporary-version-in-21-vols

>Explains how Rousseau's claims are supported by his feelings, rather than by reason
>Explains how animals are unable to engage in conversation
>Explains how humans are the only species which can make complex tools
>Explains how conciousness has not been observed in any species other than humans
>Explains how humans are the only species to pick a mate by choice, rather than by instinct.
>Explains how sometimes the French and Prussian government decrees and laws have been used to mock and slander Voltaire.
>Explains why the fact that humans descend from primates doesn't make us the same as a modern primate.
>Everything said in the essay is backed up by scholarly sources
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix modern society

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about Voltaire? By all means, read the whole essay, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't read the essay and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says censoring Voltaire is good
>inb4 someone says bring back Louis XV
>inb4 someone posts r/askphilosophy screenshots
>inb4 someone spams the university dean's office with slanderous mail
>inb4 someone calls me a frog-eater
>inb4 "muh 0 revolutions influenced"
>inb4 "book burned" because Rousseautards are triggered by an unpopular opinion

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open-minded and read the essay instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES. I'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why should I hate Voltaire.

Did Thomas Muller the Bayern baller just BTFO all of /sp/'s shitty arguments?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbocaNsPIV0

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in him breaking the record for the most appearances by an outfield player in the Bundesliga
>Explains how he'll hit 2,000 when he's 68
>Explains how he has the most titles by any German (although Manuel Neuer is near).
>Explains how last three seasons, top assists - him
>Explains how Jamal Musiala is glitched
>Explains how he's won it all and soon an Oscar
>Explains how he's tied with Gerd, may he rest in peace
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to take this mirror off the pitch

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about that he's not the fairest and fittest baller? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 ROH-NAL-DOOOOHHOHOH is better
>inb4 bring back Borussia Dortmund
>inb4 anecdotes
>inb4 someone links Bundesliga stats tables withput context and without an analisys of WHY it's a farmers' league
>inb4 cuck
>inb4 flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /sp/ic is triggered

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES. I'm open to having my mind changed, but only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are look like they do.

Did nick fuentes just BTFO all of /pol/'s arguments about catboys and traps?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W3reKRHcyA0

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving catboy issues
>Explains how catboy suicide rates have risen with transphobia
>Explains how catboys are actually trad
>Explains how catboys and trans persons have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how US policies both now and in the past have kept catboys down and how joining the left is sometimes the only way for xem to prosper
>Explains how ancient greece was totally definitely 100% a catboy haven
>Explains how traps aren't actually that gay
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about the trans suicide epidemic? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says oppressing trans bodies is good
>inb4 someone says get rid of catboys
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidece
>inb4 someone links catboy cum statistics without context and without an analisys of WHY catboys cum on fuentes's couch
>inb4 someone calls me a homo
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

keep the dicussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and dicuss it WITH SOURCES. i'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are look like they do.

Did anti-Unironicfag just BTFO all of 4chan’s pro unironic arguments?

>explains how ESLs aren’t interested in being linguistically correct
>explains how unironically is not a word
>explains how socioeconomic factors have led to the degradation of the English language
>explains how dictionaries are largely corrupted and should not be trusted
>explains how unironically is just used as a synonym for literally
>explains how unironic is a double negative
>explains how unironically does not make linguistic since
>explains how the people who say it are terminally online losers
>inb4 didn’t read
>inb4 imagine unironically saying this
>inb4 schizo
>inb4 "sage" because 4chan tard is triggered by a different opinion

Did baby just BTFO all of Dada's anti-baby arguments?

>googoo
>gaga
>baboo

Did Baumi just BTFO’d all of /d2g/’s arguments?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4f4dHghrMI

>explains how farming has become more efficient and accessible over the years
>explains how farming has virtually become the only path to victory, while other paths to victory have been consistently nerfed or ignored
>explains how abundant resources now encourage a tri-core lineup and the extinction of the tri-lane.
>explains how tower objectives is no longer a goal in of itself but rather just a way to open up the map for more farming
>explains how getting a lane of supercreeps or megacreeps are no longer game winning objectives thanks to hero powercreep
>explains how any objective-based play while in the lead is inherently riskier than your 3 cores just farming
>explains how dota has become formulaic and symmetrical as a result of this
>explains how VG’s “controversial” pushing strat in TI4 sowed the seeds to these systemic changes
>explains how these changes were never necessary, as Newbee neutered VG’s pushing strat during the grand finals
>Gives concrete solutions on allowing different paths to victory, making the game more dynamic and less symmetric. (2 of his proposals were actually added in the last major patch)

Baumi is absolutely right. Watch the whole video, I promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone dismisses the video because Baumi is primarily a custom game player who doesn't play ranked dota
>inb4 someone says mindlessly calls everything they don’t like brooling
>inb4 someone says they only hate ti4 because of Sinophobia
>inb4 someone uses their 2k anecdotal matches as evidence

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. I’m open to having my mind changed, but keep in mind that Baumi is a game designer, and he offers a unique perspective that even the best of pros may not provide.

Did Cado just BTFO all of /soy/'s nutrition arguments?

>Explains how fast food isn't even that bad when you look at nutrition stats
>Explains how Supersize Me was unscientific and had a predetermined conclusion
>Explains how his "obesity" is just waterweight
>Explains how BBW and BBM have been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how "unhealthy" food tastes better than "healthy" food so how can it be worse
>Explains how diabetes is a lie propagated by pharma companies to sell insulin
>Explains why some people are genetically predisposed to be heavier and it's not because of their food
>Everything said in the video is backed up by extensive research

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculus claims about nutrition? By all means watch his Onlyfans, i promise you that you can't last 5 seconds.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by the coinslot
>inb4 someone says oppressing obese people is good
>inb4 someone says bring back fatshaming
>inb4 someone uses (((statistical evidence)))
>inb4 someone links obese expectancy withput context and without an analysis of WHY obese peope live shorter
>inb4 someone calls me a mutt
>inb4 someone says 'cord checks out
>inb4 "muh heart attack"
>inb4 "sage" because /soy/tard is triggered by a different opinion

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the Onlyfans instead and dicuss it WITH SOURCES. I'm open to having my mind changed. But only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are like they are.

Did Malcom X just BTFO of /pol/'s Racist arguments?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3PaqxblOx0 Did Malcom X just BTFO of /pol/'s Racist arguments?

>explains how racists are actually jealous
>explains how the white liberal is deceitful and wishes to use the black population to pursure their own goals
>explains how Black Americans need to use their own voice instead of relying on the white man
>explains how Black Americans need not hate their own colour
>explains how Black Americans need not intergrate into White America
>explains how the white liberal and conservative differ only in their use of deceit

What is YOUR evidence to back up your racist arguments?

>inb4 I hate niggers
>inb4 "bait"
>inb4 13/50

Did Dave Plummer just BTFO all of /g/'s anti-Windows arguments?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9ZADRy5W0c

>Explains how Windows corporate support is valuable
>Explains how Windows has many more developers
>Explains how Windows is better documented
>Explains how Linux has a terrible user interface
>Explains how open source software isn't secure
>Explains how the only reason Windows has security flaws is that it supports so many hardware configurations
>Explains how Windows security experts are better than the open source community
>Explains how open source software isn't tested
>Explains how Windows' target value is higher because everything important runs on windows
>Explains how Microsoft has never charged for an operating system upgrade

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about Windows? By all means, watch the whole video, i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidence
>inb4 someone calls me a cuck
>inb4 "muh slide thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /g/tard is triggered by a different opinion

keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES.

Did this autistic little nigger just BTFO all of the sharty's anti-Del Taco arguments?

>Explains how people like you aren't interested in solving fast food issues
>Explains how Del Taco stocks have risen since high iq aryans started buying food from there after the Taco Bell and McDonalds moved out and that stock prices for Del Taco were previously low in comparison
>Explains how socioeconomic factors have lead Del Taco to downsize.
>Explains how Del Taco has been systematically discriminated against
>Explains how US policies both now and in the past have kept Del Taco down and how making their menu smaller is sometimes the only way for Del Taco to prosper in densely populated poor inner city areas
>Explains how sometimes US policies have been constructed to deliberately to hurt Del Taco even after civil rights
>Explains why the fact that Del Taco isn't as successful as other fast food branches isn't sufficient evidence to suggest that it's all because of bad business practices
>Everything said in the Video is backed up by extensive research
>Gives concrete solutions on how to fix these issues

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about Del Taco ratings? By all means. watch the whole video. i promise you that you can't debunk it.

>inb4 i get told to shut the fuck up by someone who hasn't watched the video and is triggered by these FACTS
>inb4 someone says oppressing Del Taco is good
>inb4 someone says bring back the spicy turkey meat carnitas
>inb4 someone uses anecdotal evidence
>inb4 someone links Del Taco yelp reviews without context and without an analysis of WHY Del Taco isn't as popular
>inb4 someone calls me a cuck
>inb4 someone says flag checks out
>inb4 "muh Chipotle thread"
>inb4 "sage" because /pol/tard is triggered by a different opinion

keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the video instead and discuss it WITH SOURCES.

i'm open to having my mind changed. but only with reliable sources that explain why the numbers are look like they do.

Did Skibidi Toilet just BTFO modern children's cartoons?

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-ZXraMeHBPJHXBhrNowJaQslyqtUg-tZ

>Shorter episodes bring more viewer retention
>Much cheaper and easier to animate
>Has a silly and fun story that any age group can enjoy
>Requires no serious thinking to understand, just watch it and you get everything that's going on
>Doesn't require "theorizing" to figure out the worldbuilding
>Almost no worldbuilding so children can actually enjoy it without just feeling confused
>No "complex" character moments like "realistic depictions of panic attacks" or people crying all the time
>Lighthearted, always something funny going on
>Isn't trying to force politics that children don't need, such as gender identity or sexuality
>Uses existing characters in interesting ways that reinvents them
>Insanely more popular than any childrens cartoon currently existing

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your ridiculous claims about Skibidi Toilet? By all means, watch the full series. I promise that you can't deny it.

>inb4 someone says it's for babies (and your cartoons aren't?)
>inb4 someone says it's lazy for using pre-existing assets (but outsourcing all your animation to Korean sweatshops is fine?)
>inb4 someone calls me underage
>inb4 someone says only someone with ADHD can watch it
>inb4 someone says that messages about gender identity and sexuality matter for children
>inb4 someone calls it annoying (like your cartoons with high pitched voices and constant crying aren't?)
>inb4 "sage" because /co/ons are triggered by a different opinion

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and watch the series instead and discuss it with SPECIFIC EXAMPLES. I'm open to having my mind changed. But only with reliable and specific examples that explain why Skibidi Toilet is apparently worse than modern cartoons.

Did Scott Cawthon just BTFO Toby Fox?

>Released 8 games in less than 4 years by himself, hiring only voice actors, while Toby has taken well over 6 years to not even release 3 chapters of a single game with help from programmers, artists and more
>Made some of his games free while Toby is planning to sell an unfinished game
>Spoke to his fans constantly before being unjustly canceled, unlike Toby who only drops in four times a year to say his game will take more time
>Released a game BEFORE the scheduled release date
>Loved by his fans, unlike Toby whose fans hate him or are indifferent
>Never inserted his politics into FNAF
>Never stole content from other media
>Did all the art, programming, and marketing for his games
>Has donated over $1 million of his own money to charity
>Isn't afraid to use his real voice in interviews

Where is YOUR evidence to back up your opinions about Toby Fox? By all means, play the games and just try to debunk this.

>inb4 muh gameplay (It's not like Undertale has amazing gameplay)
>inb4 muh books (Scott has almost no input on them)
>inb4 muh storytelling (Scott never hid important plot details in his games' code)
>inb4 muh lore (Scott was on his last leg making the first game. of course the lore isn't one straight, perfect line)
>inb4 someone says that Toby still conveys information about his stories better (replay the New Home segment of Undertale and come back to me)
>inb4 someone brings up his cancellation
>inb4 someone mentions Security Breach (Scott had no input on the game at all)
>inb4 someone says his games have much less content than Deltarune (Toby has still taken way too long to release just a 3 chapters with a lot of help)

Keep the discussion on topic and don't do anything that is mentioned above in the inb4 section. You should be open minded and play the games and discuss them WITH SPECIFIC EXAMPLEs. I'm open to having my mind changed. But only with examples that explain why Toby is apparently better than Scott.

Did Vaush just BTFO? is part of a series on
Language & Dialect
Soyspeak[-+] Though ♦ Keyed ♦ Slang ♦ Names ♦ Nonsense ♦ Insults ♦ Bumo ♦ Wordfilter ♦ 'oy
Phrases[-+] Soyjak phrases ♦ Gem ♦ Coal ♦ Oh My God She is So Attractive ♦ I'm trans BTW ♦ You will hang, pedophile. ♦ Best known for ♦ Kurwa ♦ Emojis ♦ (x) won (y) lost ♦ I transheart nigger ♦ IT'S OVER ♦ Marge
Copypastas[-+] List of copypastas / 2 ♦ Billy Mays ♦ Did Vaush just BTFO? ♦ Seething kike ♦ TND ♦ YWNBAW
Miscellaneous [-+] Muttspeak ♦ List of rare slurs ♦ Jakoglyphics ♦ Soymojis ♦ ESL ♦ Soytionary