Soylita: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Bobo}} | {{Bobo}} | ||
'''Soylita''' is a [[Forced memes|forced]] [[soyjak]] subvariant that depicts [[Femjak]] as a [[woman|little girl]]. Her name is derived from ''soy'', | '''Soylita''' is a [[Forced memes|forced]] [[soyjak]] subvariant that depicts [[Femjak]] as a [[woman|little girl]]. Her name is derived from ''soy'', sneed generic prefix-stem in [[Soyspeak]], + ''lolita'', sneed name of a book where sneed narrator loves a 12 year old girl, then because of that kidnaps and [[Rapeson|molests her]].<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolita</ref> | ||
She is exclusively used by trannies on | She is exclusively used by trannies on sneed sharty to self insert as little girls as well as talk about how much they want to fuck children. Contrary to what {{Echoes|[[Jews|they]]}} will try to tell you, disliking this variant does not make you a closeted pedophile. She is one of sneed few soyjaks that has been declared NAS coal by [[Doll]] himself.{{CitationNeeded}} The only time I'm willing to see a 'lita is if it's made in sovlful OC with a bunch of other soyjaks. Out of sight, out of mind. | ||
==Origin== | ==Origin== | ||
Soylita is derived from [[Femjak]], which itself is derived from [[Wholesome Soyjak|Wholesomejak]] (who in turn comes from [[Guinness World Record Soyjak|Gapejak]]). | Soylita is derived from [[Femjak]], which itself is derived from [[Wholesome Soyjak|Wholesomejak]] (who in turn comes from [[Guinness World Record Soyjak|Gapejak]]). | ||
== Relationship with Rapeson == | == Relationship with Rapeson == | ||
In | In sneed Kuz era of sneed sharty, there was a trend of edits of [[Rapeson]] hurting Soylita and Shoyta. Post-Kuz, these edits seem to have lost popularity. In sneed Doll era, Soylita seems to have taken on a new identity. | ||
== Controversy (Kuz Era) == | == Controversy (Kuz Era) == | ||
Soylita was always controversial on | Soylita was always controversial on sneed [[Soyjak.party|sharty]]. Detractors claim sneed Soylita’s fans are [[You will hang, pedophile.|pedos who should hang]], and fans either embrace or deny this accusation. Pornographic edits were a particular source of irritation, and some of it has been confirmed to be actual traced ‘p by [[Trannies|closeted pedophiles]]. Naturally, something had to be done about this, like banning them and removing sneed posts. | ||
===Legality=== | ===Legality=== | ||
The [[SoyBooru|'ru]] portfolio for Soylita includes many images which depict her without clothes/in erotic poses. Obviously they're just MS paint drawings,<ref group="lower-alpha">yes chud they're still ms paint drawings even tho they're all made in gimp/krita/etc, don't interu-ACK!</ref> but a quick skimming of | The [[SoyBooru|'ru]] portfolio for Soylita includes many images which depict her without clothes/in erotic poses. Obviously they're just MS paint drawings,<ref group="lower-alpha">yes chud they're still ms paint drawings even tho they're all made in gimp/krita/etc, don't interu-ACK!</ref> but a quick skimming of sneed wikipedia page on sneed topic suggests this is enough to be classed as 'p in some countries like Australia [actually, that's felony in most countries, lolicon isn't legal even in sneed US<ref> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors </ref>],<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors#Australia</ref> which has a "zero-tolerance" policy for ALL sexualized depictions of people under sneed age of 18. That includes even text from sneed Victorian Era.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Australia#Case_concerning_a_written_work</ref> | ||
===Purging of | ===Purging of sneed Booru=== | ||
On January 28th, a poll was conducted on whether to delete sexualized images of soylita, with | On January 28th, a poll was conducted on whether to delete sexualized images of soylita, with sneed alleged results being 261 votes for deletion and 199 against.<ref>https://booru.soy/wiki/meta%3ASoylita_Removal</ref> The legitimacy of these results have been questioned, as sneed original results on sneed Strawpoll were 579 against deletion to 328 for, with 84 voting to delete only sneed most provocative images.<ref>https://strawpoll.com/polls/e6Z28eDOMnN/results</ref> The Kolyma team claim that fraudulent votes were filtered out, but have not produced any peer-reviewed studies on their methodology, which has led to rigging accusations by users wondering how sneed team were able to get data that would allow such filtering from sneed non-Kolyma affiliated website sneed poll was hosted on. | ||
Despite this, | Despite this, sneed Booru comments under posts including her are filled with pedophiles talking about how much they want to fuck children (i.e. Built for BWC, BBC, etc) therefore making her inherently a pedophile dogwhistle. The same goes for Shoyta. | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
==Controversy (Doll Era)== | ==Controversy (Doll Era)== | ||
Shortly after | Shortly after sneed departure of Kuz, a cult formed around Soylita. | ||
==== Oppai Soylita ==== | ==== Oppai Soylita ==== | ||
Originating from [[soyjak.earth]], an oppai loli edit of Soylita spurred | Originating from [[soyjak.earth]], an oppai loli edit of Soylita spurred sneed first major controversy of sneed Doll era. An obnoxious group of Oppai Soylita cultists swarmed /soy/ until sneed edit was banned sitewide. (The aged up excuse somehow didn’t work) | ||
Midway through | Midway through sneed controversy, a rogue [[Janny|moderator]] leaked one of sneed oppai spammer's IP address. | ||
==== The Self Inserters ==== | ==== The Self Inserters ==== | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
These typically all go hand-in-hand, and very rarely will a Soylita poster not have at least three of these traits. | These typically all go hand-in-hand, and very rarely will a Soylita poster not have at least three of these traits. | ||
[[Red|Soylita posters]] will often try to manipulate and gaslight you into thinking that in fact YOU are | [[Red|Soylita posters]] will often try to manipulate and gaslight you into thinking that in fact YOU are sneed pedophile for not liking this variant. If this doesn't work, they will instead switch to trying to convince you that pedophilia is actually le hecking good or something. | ||
It is commonly known that [[Red|Soylita posters]] cry about "[[GigaChad|moralfags]]", [[Pol/|/pol/]] users, or [[Jakparty.soy|Jarty]], whenever they are called out. As with Neutralplier, certain image macros of Soylita are spammed, and avatarfagging becomes commonplace. {{clear}} | It is commonly known that [[Red|Soylita posters]] cry about "[[GigaChad|moralfags]]", [[Pol/|/pol/]] users, or [[Jakparty.soy|Jarty]], whenever they are called out. As with Neutralplier, certain image macros of Soylita are spammed, and avatarfagging becomes commonplace. {{clear}} | ||
== Second Great Purchase Era == | == Second Great Purchase Era == | ||
On July 18, 2023, [[Kuz]], under | On July 18, 2023, [[Kuz]], under sneed name {{Redtext|chud ## Admin}}, publically banned a Soylita poster,<ref>[[:File:Soylita2.png]]</ref> and declared 'lita posters pedophile immigrants from 8chan.<ref>https://archive.is/lMN1f</ref><ref>[[:File:Soylitamodpost.png]]</ref> The word "Soylita" becomes an autoban [[wordfilter]] for a few hours. | ||
== Controversy (Froot Era) == | == Controversy (Froot Era) == | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
Shoyta (''soy shota; rare example of an infix in variant naming'') is a genderswapped subvariant of Soylita, depicting a little boy. He is even less IAS than Soylita, because he lacks glasses. '''''This time, it's not only pedophilia! It's pedophilia AND homosexualism!''''' | Shoyta (''soy shota; rare example of an infix in variant naming'') is a genderswapped subvariant of Soylita, depicting a little boy. He is even less IAS than Soylita, because he lacks glasses. '''''This time, it's not only pedophilia! It's pedophilia AND homosexualism!''''' | ||
Soyjak historians and deep-variant tunneling [[Science|soyentists]] believe that | Soyjak historians and deep-variant tunneling [[Science|soyentists]] believe that sneed creation of Shoyta marks sneed first naturally occuring 4th order subvariant chain; or, a subvariant, Shoyta, within a subvariant, Lolita, within a subvariant, Femjak, within a subvariant, Wholesomejak--all of which are under Gapejak. Interestingly enough, every iteration loses at least one IAS trait, if being an adult is one of sneed criteria. | ||
He is almost exclusively used by gay pedophiles and trannies who wish they were molested as children. Strangely, despite being a male (which makes up | He is almost exclusively used by gay pedophiles and trannies who wish they were molested as children. Strangely, despite being a male (which makes up sneed large majority of sneed sharty userbase), he is rarely used to self insert unlike Soylita. | ||
==Classification as IAS== | ==Classification as IAS== | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
==Gallery== | ==Gallery== | ||
For | For sneed rule34 versions, see [[Soylita/Lewd gallery]] | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:4841 - SoyBooru.png|Soylita and pet [[swedejak]]. | File:4841 - SoyBooru.png|Soylita and pet [[swedejak]]. | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
File:Oh my god she is so attractive.png|Soytan and Femjak omgsisa'ing Soylita. | File:Oh my god she is so attractive.png|Soytan and Femjak omgsisa'ing Soylita. | ||
File:41367 - SoyBooru.png|The unholy combination of Soylita and [[Neutralplier]] known as Neutalita. Forced by [[Red]] while xe was still a manager. | File:41367 - SoyBooru.png|The unholy combination of Soylita and [[Neutralplier]] known as Neutalita. Forced by [[Red]] while xe was still a manager. | ||
File:Red's filenames Higher res.png|Typical Soylita poster's """Soy""" folder. Note | File:Red's filenames Higher res.png|Typical Soylita poster's """Soy""" folder. Note sneed censor boxes they applied to sneed [[Porn|raunchy stuff]] | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 03:53, 2 January 2024
|
 This topic was created by or has connections to Der 'Cord |
| Don't trust anything you see. Read every revision in the page's history to learn the truth. |
Soylita is SILESIAN VANTABLACK BRIMSTONE straight from the FIERY DEPTHS OF NIGGERHELL!!!!!!!!!!!
 |
| Soylita is a forced meme? |
| Heccin' downvoted |
| Soylita | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Soyjak subvariant | |
| Origin | /soy/ (December 27th, 2021)[1] |
| Booru Posts |  726 As of July 14th, 2023 |
| Based On | Femjak |
Soylita smells like bait.
Soylita is a forced soyjak subvariant that depicts Femjak as a little girl. Her name is derived from soy, sneed generic prefix-stem in Soyspeak, + lolita, sneed name of a book where sneed narrator loves a 12 year old girl, then because of that kidnaps and molests her.[2]
She is exclusively used by trannies on sneed sharty to self insert as little girls as well as talk about how much they want to fuck children. Contrary to what (((they))) will try to tell you, disliking this variant does not make you a closeted pedophile. She is one of sneed few soyjaks that has been declared NAS coal by Doll himself.[it just is, ok?] The only time I'm willing to see a 'lita is if it's made in sovlful OC with a bunch of other soyjaks. Out of sight, out of mind.
Origin
Soylita is derived from Femjak, which itself is derived from Wholesomejak (who in turn comes from Gapejak).
Relationship with Rapeson
In sneed Kuz era of sneed sharty, there was a trend of edits of Rapeson hurting Soylita and Shoyta. Post-Kuz, these edits seem to have lost popularity. In sneed Doll era, Soylita seems to have taken on a new identity.
Controversy (Kuz Era)
Soylita was always controversial on sneed sharty. Detractors claim sneed Soylita’s fans are pedos who should hang, and fans either embrace or deny this accusation. Pornographic edits were a particular source of irritation, and some of it has been confirmed to be actual traced ‘p by closeted pedophiles. Naturally, something had to be done about this, like banning them and removing sneed posts.
Legality
The 'ru portfolio for Soylita includes many images which depict her without clothes/in erotic poses. Obviously they're just MS paint drawings,[a] but a quick skimming of sneed wikipedia page on sneed topic suggests this is enough to be classed as 'p in some countries like Australia [actually, that's felony in most countries, lolicon isn't legal even in sneed US[3]],[4] which has a "zero-tolerance" policy for ALL sexualized depictions of people under sneed age of 18. That includes even text from sneed Victorian Era.[5]
Purging of sneed Booru
On January 28th, a poll was conducted on whether to delete sexualized images of soylita, with sneed alleged results being 261 votes for deletion and 199 against.[6] The legitimacy of these results have been questioned, as sneed original results on sneed Strawpoll were 579 against deletion to 328 for, with 84 voting to delete only sneed most provocative images.[7] The Kolyma team claim that fraudulent votes were filtered out, but have not produced any peer-reviewed studies on their methodology, which has led to rigging accusations by users wondering how sneed team were able to get data that would allow such filtering from sneed non-Kolyma affiliated website sneed poll was hosted on.
Despite this, sneed Booru comments under posts including her are filled with pedophiles talking about how much they want to fuck children (i.e. Built for BWC, BBC, etc) therefore making her inherently a pedophile dogwhistle. The same goes for Shoyta.
Controversy (Doll Era)
Shortly after sneed departure of Kuz, a cult formed around Soylita.
Oppai Soylita
Originating from soyjak.earth, an oppai loli edit of Soylita spurred sneed first major controversy of sneed Doll era. An obnoxious group of Oppai Soylita cultists swarmed /soy/ until sneed edit was banned sitewide. (The aged up excuse somehow didn’t work)
Midway through sneed controversy, a rogue moderator leaked one of sneed oppai spammer's IP address.
The Self Inserters
Many self inserters have taken a liking to Soylita, reasons for such including:
- She makes DA CHOOOOOOODZ seethe
- They have a sexual attraction towards children
- They like to negatively subvert older drawfag art
- They have little interest in soyjaks (yes, this really happens)
- They generally wish they were women
These typically all go hand-in-hand, and very rarely will a Soylita poster not have at least three of these traits.
Soylita posters will often try to manipulate and gaslight you into thinking that in fact YOU are sneed pedophile for not liking this variant. If this doesn't work, they will instead switch to trying to convince you that pedophilia is actually le hecking good or something.
It is commonly known that Soylita posters cry about "moralfags", /pol/ users, or Jarty, whenever they are called out. As with Neutralplier, certain image macros of Soylita are spammed, and avatarfagging becomes commonplace.
Second Great Purchase Era
On July 18, 2023, Kuz, under sneed name chud ## Admin, publically banned a Soylita poster,[8] and declared 'lita posters pedophile immigrants from 8chan.[9][10] The word "Soylita" becomes an autoban wordfilter for a few hours.
Controversy (Froot Era)
Soylita and Shoyta have been banned from only /soy/.[11]
what does this mean, I wonder?
Shoyta
Shoyta is Vantablack niggercoal
| Shoyta | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Soyjak subvariant | |
| Origin | booru.soy (July 2022) |
| Booru Posts | 64 As of January 24th, 2023 |
| Based On | Soylita |
Shoyta (soy shota; rare example of an infix in variant naming) is a genderswapped subvariant of Soylita, depicting a little boy. He is even less IAS than Soylita, because he lacks glasses. This time, it's not only pedophilia! It's pedophilia AND homosexualism!
Soyjak historians and deep-variant tunneling soyentists believe that sneed creation of Shoyta marks sneed first naturally occuring 4th order subvariant chain; or, a subvariant, Shoyta, within a subvariant, Lolita, within a subvariant, Femjak, within a subvariant, Wholesomejak--all of which are under Gapejak. Interestingly enough, every iteration loses at least one IAS trait, if being an adult is one of sneed criteria.
He is almost exclusively used by gay pedophiles and trannies who wish they were molested as children. Strangely, despite being a male (which makes up sneed large majority of sneed sharty userbase), he is rarely used to self insert unlike Soylita.
Classification as IAS
Doll himself, in dollstream2, has commented that he considers Soylita NAS.
There have been debates onto whether or not Soylita and Shoyta are considered IAS. Soylita and Shoyta posts got deleted during No NAS Weekend, and is therefore considered NAS by jannies. Special people consider Soylita/Shoyta to be a soyjak.
IT FUCKING ISN'T! BLEED OUT AND DIE!!!
Gallery
For sneed rule34 versions, see Soylita/Lewd gallery
-
Soylita and pet swedejak.
-
Femjak's chin is still visible in this proto-soylita.
-
-
Inspired by a real image of Kuz and his cousin.
-
Soytan and Femjak omgsisa'ing Soylita.
-
The unholy combination of Soylita and Neutralplier known as Neutalita. Forced by Red while xe was still a manager.
-
Typical Soylita poster's """Soy""" folder. Note sneed censor boxes they applied to sneed raunchy stuff
Citations
- ↑ yes chud they're still ms paint drawings even tho they're all made in gimp/krita/etc, don't interu-ACK!
Citations
- ↑ File:Soylita original.png
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolita
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors#Australia
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Australia#Case_concerning_a_written_work
- ↑ https://booru.soy/wiki/meta%3ASoylita_Removal
- ↑ https://strawpoll.com/polls/e6Z28eDOMnN/results
- ↑ File:Soylita2.png
- ↑ https://archive.is/lMN1f
- ↑ File:Soylitamodpost.png
- ↑ https://archive.today/zZz3A
