Soylita: Difference between revisions
EszettDoll (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by 68.195.109.56 (talk) to last revision by 6ixϪhrembo) Tags: Removed redirect Rollback |
(getting rid of irrelevant sentences and sections and improving the article) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Bobo}} | {{Bobo}} | ||
'''Soylita''' is a [[Forced memes|forced]] [[soyjak]] subvariant that depicts [[ | '''Soylita''' is a [[Forced memes|forced]] [[soyjak]] subvariant that depicts [[Femjak]] as a [[woman|little girl]]. Her name is derived from ''soy'', the generic prefix-stem in [[Soyspeak]], + ''lolita'', the name of a book where the narrator loves a 12 year old girl, then because of that kidnaps and [[Rapeson|molests her]].<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolita</ref> | ||
She is exclusively used by trannies on the sharty to self insert as little girls as well as talk about how much they want to fuck children. Contrary to what ((([[Jews|they]]))) will try to tell you, disliking this variant does not make you a closeted pedophile. She is one of the few soyjaks that has been declared NAS coal by [[Doll]] himself.{{CitationNeeded}} | |||
==Origin== | ==Origin== | ||
Soylita is derived from [[Femjak]], which itself is derived from [[Wholesome Soyjak|Wholesomejak]] (who in turn comes from [[Guinness World Record Soyjak|Gapejak]]). | Soylita is derived from [[Femjak]], which itself is derived from [[Wholesome Soyjak|Wholesomejak]] (who in turn comes from [[Guinness World Record Soyjak|Gapejak]]). | ||
| Line 23: | Line 20: | ||
== Relationship with Rapeson == | == Relationship with Rapeson == | ||
In the Kuz era of the sharty, there was a trend of edits of [[Rapeson]] hurting Soylita and Shoyta. Post-Kuz, these edits seem to have lost popularity. In the Doll era, Soylita seems to have taken on a new identity. | In the Kuz era of the sharty, there was a trend of edits of [[Rapeson]] hurting Soylita and Shoyta. Post-Kuz, these edits seem to have lost popularity. In the Doll era, Soylita seems to have taken on a new identity. | ||
== Controversy (Kuz Era) == | == Controversy (Kuz Era) == | ||
Soylita was always controversial on the [[Soyjak.party|sharty]]. Detractors claim the Soylita’s fans are [[You will hang, pedophile.|pedos who should hang]], and fans either embrace or deny this accusation. Pornographic edits were a particular source of irritation, and some of it has been confirmed to be actual traced ‘p by [[Trannies|closeted pedophiles]]. Naturally, something had to be done about this, like banning them and removing the posts. | |||
===Legality=== | ===Legality=== | ||
The [[SoyBooru|'ru]] portfolio for Soylita includes many images which depict her without clothes/in erotic poses. Obviously they're just MS paint drawings,<ref group="lower-alpha">yes chud they're still ms paint drawings even tho they're all made in gimp/krita/etc, don't interu-ACK!</ref> but a | The [[SoyBooru|'ru]] portfolio for Soylita includes many images which depict her without clothes/in erotic poses. Obviously they're just MS paint drawings,<ref group="lower-alpha">yes chud they're still ms paint drawings even tho they're all made in gimp/krita/etc, don't interu-ACK!</ref> but a quick skimming of the wikipedia page on the topic suggests this is enough to be classed as 'p in some countries like Australia,<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors#Australia</ref> which has a "zero-tolerance" policy for ALL sexualized depictions of people under the age of 18. That includes even text from the Victorian Era.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Australia#Case_concerning_a_written_work</ref> | ||
===Purging of the Booru=== | ===Purging of the Booru=== | ||
On January 28th, a poll was conducted on whether to delete sexualized images of soylita, with the alleged results being 261 votes for deletion and 199 against.<ref>https://booru.soy/wiki/meta%3ASoylita_Removal</ref> The legitimacy of these results have been questioned, as the original results on the Strawpoll were 579 against deletion to 328 for, with 84 voting to delete only the most provocative images.<ref>https://strawpoll.com/polls/e6Z28eDOMnN/results</ref> The Kolyma team claim that fraudulent votes were filtered out, but have not produced any peer-reviewed studies on their methodology, which has led to rigging accusations by users wondering how the team were able to get data that would allow such filtering from the non-Kolyma affiliated website the poll was hosted on. | On January 28th, a poll was conducted on whether to delete sexualized images of soylita, with the alleged results being 261 votes for deletion and 199 against.<ref>https://booru.soy/wiki/meta%3ASoylita_Removal</ref> The legitimacy of these results have been questioned, as the original results on the Strawpoll were 579 against deletion to 328 for, with 84 voting to delete only the most provocative images.<ref>https://strawpoll.com/polls/e6Z28eDOMnN/results</ref> The Kolyma team claim that fraudulent votes were filtered out, but have not produced any peer-reviewed studies on their methodology, which has led to rigging accusations by users wondering how the team were able to get data that would allow such filtering from the non-Kolyma affiliated website the poll was hosted on. | ||
| Line 50: | Line 44: | ||
Many [[Trannies|self inserters]] have taken a liking to Soylita, reasons for such including: | Many [[Trannies|self inserters]] have taken a liking to Soylita, reasons for such including: | ||
* She makes [[ | * She makes [[Chudjak|DA CHOOOOOOODZ]] seethe | ||
* They have a sexual attraction towards children | * They have a sexual attraction towards [[Pedophilia|children]] | ||
* They like to | * They like to negatively subvert older drawfag art | ||
* They have little interest in soyjaks (yes, this really happens) | * They have little interest in soyjaks (yes, this really happens) | ||
* They generally wish they were women | * They generally wish they were [[Trannies|women]] | ||
These typically all go hand-in-hand, and very rarely will a Soylita poster not have at least three of these traits. | These typically all go hand-in-hand, and very rarely will a Soylita poster not have at least three of these traits. | ||
| Line 66: | Line 60: | ||
== Controversy (Froot Era) == | == Controversy (Froot Era) == | ||
Soylita and Shoyta have been banned from only [[Soy/|/soy/]].<ref>https://archive.today/zZz3A</ref> | |||
==Shoyta== | ==Shoyta== | ||
| Line 82: | Line 76: | ||
Soyjak historians and deep-variant tunneling [[Science|soyentists]] believe that the creation of Shoyta marks the first naturally occuring 4th order subvariant chain; or, a subvariant, Shoyta, within a subvariant, Lolita, within a subvariant, Femjak, within a subvariant, Wholesomejak--all of which are under Gapejak. Interestingly enough, every iteration loses at least one IAS trait, if being an adult is one of the criteria. | Soyjak historians and deep-variant tunneling [[Science|soyentists]] believe that the creation of Shoyta marks the first naturally occuring 4th order subvariant chain; or, a subvariant, Shoyta, within a subvariant, Lolita, within a subvariant, Femjak, within a subvariant, Wholesomejak--all of which are under Gapejak. Interestingly enough, every iteration loses at least one IAS trait, if being an adult is one of the criteria. | ||
He is almost exclusively used by gay pedophiles and trannies who wish they were molested as children. Strangely, despite being a male (which makes up the large majority of the sharty userbase), he is rarely used to self insert unlike Soylita. | He is almost exclusively used by gay pedophiles and trannies who wish they were molested as children. Strangely, despite being a male (which makes up the large majority of the sharty userbase), he is rarely used to self insert unlike Soylita. | ||
==Classification as IAS== | ==Classification as IAS== | ||
There have been debates onto whether or not Soylita and Shoyta are considered IAS | There have been debates onto whether or not Soylita and Shoyta are considered IAS. Soylita and Shoyta posts got deleted during No NAS Weekend, and is therefore considered NAS by [[jannies]]. [[Doll]] himself, in dollstream2, has commented that he considers Soylita NAS. [[Discord|Special people]] consider Soylita/Shoyta to be a soyjak. | ||
==Gallery== | ==Gallery== | ||
Revision as of 16:24, 17 September 2023
|
 This topic was created by or has connections to Der 'Cord |
| Don't trust anything you see. Read every revision in the page's history to learn the truth. |
Soylita is pedophilic BRIMSTONE.
| Soylita | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Soyjak subvariant | |
| Origin | /soy/ (December 27th, 2021)[1] |
| Booru Posts |  726 As of July 14th, 2023 |
| Based On | Femjak |
Soylita smells like bait.
Soylita is a forced soyjak subvariant that depicts Femjak as a little girl. Her name is derived from soy, the generic prefix-stem in Soyspeak, + lolita, the name of a book where the narrator loves a 12 year old girl, then because of that kidnaps and molests her.[2]
She is exclusively used by trannies on the sharty to self insert as little girls as well as talk about how much they want to fuck children. Contrary to what (((they))) will try to tell you, disliking this variant does not make you a closeted pedophile. She is one of the few soyjaks that has been declared NAS coal by Doll himself.[it just is, ok?]
Origin
Soylita is derived from Femjak, which itself is derived from Wholesomejak (who in turn comes from Gapejak).
Relationship with Rapeson
In the Kuz era of the sharty, there was a trend of edits of Rapeson hurting Soylita and Shoyta. Post-Kuz, these edits seem to have lost popularity. In the Doll era, Soylita seems to have taken on a new identity.
Controversy (Kuz Era)
Soylita was always controversial on the sharty. Detractors claim the Soylita’s fans are pedos who should hang, and fans either embrace or deny this accusation. Pornographic edits were a particular source of irritation, and some of it has been confirmed to be actual traced ‘p by closeted pedophiles. Naturally, something had to be done about this, like banning them and removing the posts.
Legality
The 'ru portfolio for Soylita includes many images which depict her without clothes/in erotic poses. Obviously they're just MS paint drawings,[a] but a quick skimming of the wikipedia page on the topic suggests this is enough to be classed as 'p in some countries like Australia,[3] which has a "zero-tolerance" policy for ALL sexualized depictions of people under the age of 18. That includes even text from the Victorian Era.[4]
Purging of the Booru
On January 28th, a poll was conducted on whether to delete sexualized images of soylita, with the alleged results being 261 votes for deletion and 199 against.[5] The legitimacy of these results have been questioned, as the original results on the Strawpoll were 579 against deletion to 328 for, with 84 voting to delete only the most provocative images.[6] The Kolyma team claim that fraudulent votes were filtered out, but have not produced any peer-reviewed studies on their methodology, which has led to rigging accusations by users wondering how the team were able to get data that would allow such filtering from the non-Kolyma affiliated website the poll was hosted on.
Despite this, the Booru comments under posts including her are filled with pedophiles talking about how much they want to fuck children (i.e. Built for BWC, BBC, etc) therefore making her inherently a pedophile dogwhistle. The same goes for Shoyta.
Controversy (Doll Era)
Shortly after the departure of Kuz, a cult formed around Soylita.
Oppai Soylita
Originating from soyjak.earth, an oppai loli edit of Soylita spurred the first major controversy of the Doll era. An obnoxious group of Oppai Soylita cultists swarmed /soy/ until the edit was banned sitewide. (The aged up excuse somehow didn’t work)
Midway through the controversy, a rogue moderator leaked one of the oppai spammer's IP address.
The Self Inserters
Many self inserters have taken a liking to Soylita, reasons for such including:
- She makes DA CHOOOOOOODZ seethe
- They have a sexual attraction towards children
- They like to negatively subvert older drawfag art
- They have little interest in soyjaks (yes, this really happens)
- They generally wish they were women
These typically all go hand-in-hand, and very rarely will a Soylita poster not have at least three of these traits.
Soylita posters will often try to manipulate and gaslight you into thinking that in fact YOU are the pedophile for not liking this variant. If this doesn't work, they will instead switch to trying to convince you that pedophilia is actually le hecking good or something.
It is commonly known that Soylita posters cry about "moralfags", /pol/ users, or Jarty, whenever they are called out. As with Neutralplier, certain image macros of Soylita are spammed, and avatarfagging becomes commonplace.
Second Great Purchase Era
On July 18, 2023, Kuz, under the name chud ## Admin, publically banned a Soylita poster,[7] and declared 'lita posters pedophile immigrants from 8chan.[8][9] The word "Soylita" becomes an autoban wordfilter for a few hours.
Controversy (Froot Era)
Soylita and Shoyta have been banned from only /soy/.[10]
Shoyta
| Shoyta | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Soyjak subvariant | |
| Origin | booru.soy (July 2022) |
| Booru Posts | 64 As of January 24th, 2023 |
| Based On | Soylita |
Shoyta (soy shota; rare example of an infix in variant naming) is a genderswapped subvariant of Soylita, depicting a little boy. He is even less IAS than Soylita, because he lacks glasses.
Soyjak historians and deep-variant tunneling soyentists believe that the creation of Shoyta marks the first naturally occuring 4th order subvariant chain; or, a subvariant, Shoyta, within a subvariant, Lolita, within a subvariant, Femjak, within a subvariant, Wholesomejak--all of which are under Gapejak. Interestingly enough, every iteration loses at least one IAS trait, if being an adult is one of the criteria.
He is almost exclusively used by gay pedophiles and trannies who wish they were molested as children. Strangely, despite being a male (which makes up the large majority of the sharty userbase), he is rarely used to self insert unlike Soylita.
Classification as IAS
There have been debates onto whether or not Soylita and Shoyta are considered IAS. Soylita and Shoyta posts got deleted during No NAS Weekend, and is therefore considered NAS by jannies. Doll himself, in dollstream2, has commented that he considers Soylita NAS. Special people consider Soylita/Shoyta to be a soyjak.
Gallery
-
Soylita and pet swedejak.
-
Femjak's chin is still visible in this proto-soylita.
-
-
Inspired by a real image of Kuz and his cousin.
-
Soytan and Femjak omgsisa'ing Soylita.
-
The unholy combination of Soylita and Neutralplier known as Neutalita. Absolute sharty killing brimstone.
-
Typical Soylita poster's """Soy""" folder. Note the censor boxes they applied to the raunchy stuff
Citations
- ↑ yes chud they're still ms paint drawings even tho they're all made in gimp/krita/etc, don't interu-ACK!
Citations
- ↑ File:Soylita original.png
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolita
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors#Australia
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Australia#Case_concerning_a_written_work
- ↑ https://booru.soy/wiki/meta%3ASoylita_Removal
- ↑ https://strawpoll.com/polls/e6Z28eDOMnN/results
- ↑ File:Soylita2.png
- ↑ https://archive.is/lMN1f
- ↑ File:Soylitamodpost.png
- ↑ https://archive.today/zZz3A
